Advertisement

Acromioclavicular reconstruction techniques after acromioclavicular joint injuries: A systematic review of biomechanical studies

      Highlights

      • An optimal technique, mimicking the biomechanics of the native joint, is not yet available.
      • A sole acromioclavicular reconstruction, may be a solution to treat acromioclavicular injuries.
      • A standard biomechanical testing protocol must be defined to compare biomechanical studies.

      Abstract

      Background

      Residual horizontal instability after surgical treatment for acromioclavicular joint injuries is seen as a potential cause of suboptimal clinical outcomes. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the acromioclavicular capsule/ligaments are the primary restraints for anteroposterior translation. However, limited studies have addressed the biomechanics of a reconstruction of the acromioclavicular capsule/ligaments. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical role of acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction techniques after an acromioclavicular joint injury.

      Methods

      A search was carried out on the databases Medline and EMBASE, and was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Biomechanical studies addressing horizontal and vertical displacement or joint stiffness after reconstructing the acromioclavicular capsule/ligament with or without coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction, were included.

      Findings

      Nineteen studies were included in this review after screening and eligibility assessment. Five of them investigated different sole acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction techniques. In 10 studies, a sole coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction was compared to a coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with additional acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction. The remaining 4 studies compared different acromioclavicular capsule/ligament with coracoclavicular reconstruction techniques with each other.

      Interpretation

      Several testing protocols to evaluate acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction have been described and can make it difficult to compare the results of the different studies. Acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction may provide increased anteroposterior and rotational stability but an optimal reconstruction technique, which mimics all biomechanical characteristics of the native joint is not yet available.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Abrams G.D.
        • McGarry M.H.
        • Jain N.S.
        • Freehill M.T.
        • Shin S.-J.
        • Cheung E.V.
        • Lee T.Q.
        • Safran M.R.
        Biomechanical evaluation of a coracoclavicular and acromioclacicular ligament reconstruction technique utilizing a single continuous intramedullary free tendon graft.
        J. Shoul. Elbow Surg. U. S. 2013; 22: 979-985
        • Beitzel K.
        • Obopilwe E.
        • Apostolakos J.
        • Cote M.P.
        • Russell R.P.
        • Charette R.
        • Singh H.
        • Arciero R.A.
        • Imhoff A.B.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        Rotational and translational stability of different methods for direct acromioclavicular ligament repair in anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.
        Am. J. Sports Med. U. S. 2014; 42: 2141-2148
        • Cook J.B.
        • Tokish J.M.
        Surgical management of acromioclavicular dislocations.
        Clin. Sports Med. U. S. 2014; 33: 721-737
        • Costic R.S.
        • Labriola J.E.
        • Rodosky M.W.
        • Debski R.E.
        Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
        Am. J. Sports Med. U. S. 2004; 32: 1929-1936
        • Debski R.E.
        • Parsons 4th, I.M.
        • Woo S.L.
        • Fu F.H.
        Effect of capsular injury on acromioclavicular joint mechanics.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. U.S. 2001; 83: 1344-1351
        • Dyrna F.
        • Imhoff F.B.
        • Haller B.
        • Braun S.
        • Obopilwe E.
        • Apostolakos J.M.
        • Morikawa D.
        • Imhoff A.B.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        • Beitzel K.
        Primary stability of an acromioclavicular joint repair is affected by the type of additional reconstruction of the acromioclavicular capsule.
        Am. J. Sports Med. U. S. 2018; 46: 3471-3479
        • Epstein D.
        • Day M.
        • Rokito A.
        Current concepts in the surgical management of acromioclavicular joint injuries.
        Bull. NYU Hosp. Jt. Dis. U. S. 2012; 70: 11-24
        • Eschler A.
        • Gradl G.
        • Gierer P.
        • Mittlmeier T.
        • Beck M.
        Hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint separations restores coracoclavicular distance more accurately than PDS augmentation, however presents with a high rate of acromial osteolysis.
        Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. Germany. 2012; 132: 33-39
        • Freedman J.A.
        • Adamson G.J.
        • Bui C.
        • Lee T.Q.
        Biomechanical evaluation of the acromioclavicular capsular ligaments and reconstruction with an intramedullary free tissue graft.
        Am. J. Sports Med. SAGE Publications Inc. STM. 2010; 38: 958-964
        • Garg R.
        • Adamson G.J.
        • Javidan P.
        • Lee T.Q.
        Biomechanical comparison of an intramedullary and extramedullary free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex.
        Clin. Orthop. Surg. 2013; 5: 298-305
        • Gogna P.
        • Mukhopadhyay R.
        • Singh A.
        • Singla R.
        • Batra A.
        • Magu N.K.
        • Nara R.
        Mini incision acromio-clavicular joint reconstruction using palmaris longus tendon graft.
        Musculoskelet. Surg. Italy. 2015; 99: 33-37
        • Gonzalez-Lomas G.
        • Javidan P.
        • Lin T.
        • Adamson G.J.
        • Limpisvasti O.
        • Lee T.Q.
        Intramedullary acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction strengthens isolated coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in acromioclavicular dislocations.
        Am. J. Sports Med. SAGE Publications Inc. STM. 2010; 38: 2113-2122
        • Grutter P.W.
        • Petersen S.A.
        Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint.
        Am. J. Sports Med. 2005; 33: 13-15
        • Grutter P.W.
        • Petersen S.A.
        Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint.
        Am. J. Sports Med. U. S. 2005; 33: 1723-1728
        • Hislop P.
        • Sakata K.
        • Ackland D.C.
        • Gotmaker R.
        • Evans M.C.
        Acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a biomechanical study of bidirectional stability and strength.
        Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2019; 7 (2325967119836751)
        • Ibrahim D.K.
        • Lam P.H.
        • Aveledo Anzola R.J.
        • Murrell G.A.
        Biomechanical evaluation of an independent acromioclavicular ligament repair for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.
        Should. Elb. 2020; 12: 184-192
        • Joukainen A.
        • Kröger H.
        • Niemitukia L.
        • Mäkelä E.A.
        • Väätäinen U.
        Results of operative and nonoperative treatment of Rockwood types III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a prospective, randomized trial with an 18- to 20-year follow-up.
        Orthop. J. Sports Med. U. S. 2014; 2 (2325967114560130)
        • Lädermann A.
        • Gueorguiev B.
        • Stimec B.
        • Fasel J.
        • Rothstock S.
        • Hoffmeyer P.
        Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study of three techniques.
        J. Shoul. Elbow Surg. U. S. 2013; 22: 171-178
        • Lee K.W.
        • Debski R.E.
        • Chen C.H.
        • Woo S.L.
        • Fu F.H.
        Functional evaluation of the ligaments at the acromioclavicular joint during anteroposterior and superoinferior translation.
        Am. J. Sports Med. U. S. 1997; 25: 858-862
        • Liu Y.
        • Zhang X.
        • Yu Y.
        • Ding W.
        • Gao Y.
        • Wang Y.
        • Yang R.
        • Dhawan V.
        Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation.
        Medicine. 2021; 100e27007
        • Martetschläger F.
        • Florian E.
        • Andreas L.
        Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular PDS augmentation for complete AC joint dislocation showed insufficient properties in a cadaver model.
        Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2013; 21: 438-444
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        • Arciero R.A.
        • Bicos J.
        Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries.
        Am. J. Sports Med. U. S. 2007; 35: 316-329
        • Metzlaff S.
        • Rosslenbroich S.
        • Forkel P.H.
        • Schliemann B.
        • Arshad H.
        • Raschke M.
        • Petersen W.
        Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction.
        Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Germany. 2016; 24: 1972-1978
        • Morikawa D.
        • Huleatt J.B.
        • Muench L.N.
        • Kia C.
        • Berthold D.P.
        • Cote M.P.
        • Obopilwe E.
        • Kelolli D.
        • Scheiderer B.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        Posterior rotational and translational stability in acromioclavicular ligament complex reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical analysis in cadaveric specimens.
        Am. J. Sports Med. U. S. 2020; 48: 2525-2533
        • Morikawa D.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        • Obopilwe E.
        • Cote M.P.
        • Kia C.
        • Johnson J.D.
        • Imhoff F.B.
        • Scheiderer B.
        Reconstruction of the acromioclavicular ligament complex using dermal allograft: a biomechanical analysis.
        Arthrosc. U. S. 2020; 36: 108-115
        • Peeters I.
        • Herregodts S.
        • de Wilde L.
        • van Tongel A.
        Biomechanical evaluation of a new technique for acromioclavicular stabilization.
        Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. France. 2020; 106: 247-254
        • Saier T.
        • Venjakob A.J.
        • Minzlaff P.
        • Föhr P.
        • Lindell F.
        • Imhoff A.B.
        • Vogt S.
        • Braun S.
        Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study.
        Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Germany. 2015; 23: 1498-1505
        • Schär M.O.
        • Jenni S.
        • Fessel G.
        • Snedeker J.G.
        • Scheibel M.
        • Zumstein M.A.
        Biomechanical comparison of two biplanar and one monoplanar reconstruction techniques of the acromioclavicular joint.
        Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2019; 139: 779-786
        • Scheibel M.
        • Dröschel S.
        • Gerhardt C.
        • Kraus N.
        Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.
        Am. J. Sports Med. U. S. 2011; 39: 1507-1516
        • Shin S.-J.
        • Campbell S.
        • Scott J.
        • McGarry M.H.
        • Lee T.Q.
        Simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft.
        Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Germany. 2014; 22: 2216-2222
        • Tauber M.
        • Valler D.
        • Lichtenberg S.
        • Magosch P.
        • Moroder P.
        • Habermeyer P.
        Arthroscopic stabilization of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: triple- versus single-bundle reconstruction.
        Am. J. Sports Med. U. S. 2016; 44: 482-489
        • Theopold J.
        • Schöbel T.
        • Fischer J.-P.
        • Löffler S.
        • Osterhoff G.
        • Schleifenbaum S.
        • Hepp P.
        Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: an additional acromioclavicular cerclage does not improve horizontal stability in double coraco-clavicular tunnel technique.
        Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Germany. 2019; 27: 3827-3834
        • Voss A.
        • Löffler T.
        • Reuter S.
        • Imhoff A.B.
        • Kellner R.
        • Csapo R.
        • Braun S.
        Additional acromioclavicular cerclage limits lateral tilt of the scapula in patients with arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.
        Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. Germany. 2021; 141: 1331-1338
        • Weiser L.
        • Nüchtern J.V.
        • Sellenschloh K.
        • Püschel K.
        • Morlock M.M.
        • Rueger J.M.
        • Hoffmann M.
        • Lehmann W.
        • Großterlinden L.G.
        Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair.
        Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Germany. 2017; 25: 2025-2031