Advertisement

In vivo kinematic comparison of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending

      Highlights

      • Weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending were evaluated.
      • The medial side of the femur showed no anterior motion in the two states.
      • Anteroposterior position of the lateral side differed in the mid-flexion range.
      • Femoral rotational kinematics were different between the two states.
      • Effect of weight-bearing on kinematics was small in the medial compartment.

      Abstract

      Background

      This study aimed to determine the kinematics of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty by comparing weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending and to evaluate the effect of the weight-bearing state on the kinematics.

      Methods

      The kinematics of 19 knees were investigated under fluoroscopy during squatting (weight-bearing) and active-assisted knee bending (non-weight-bearing) using two- to three-dimensional registration technique. Accordingly, range of motion, anteroposterior translation for the medial and lateral low contact points, axial rotation of the femoral component relative to the tibial component and kinematic pathway were evaluated.

      Findings

      There was no difference in range of motion between the two states. The medial anteroposterior translation showed no significant movement with no anterior translation in both the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing from 0° to 90° of flexion. Regarding the lateral anteroposterior translation, a posterior translation was observed during weight-bearing, whereas a slight anterior translation from 0° to 30° of flexion and subsequent posterior translation were found in the non-weight-bearing. Femoral external rotation was observed in the weight-bearing, whereas femoral internal rotation was seen from 0° to 30° of flexion and subsequent femoral external rotation was observed in the non-weight-bearing. The kinematic pathway showed medial pivot motion and subsequent bicondylar rollback in the weight-bearing, whereas only medial pivot motion was observed in the non-weight-bearing.

      Interpretation

      The medial anteroposterior translation of the femur during deep knee bending showed no anterior motion in the two states. The lateral anteroposterior translation and femoral rotation were different in the mid-flexion range between the two states.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Akagi M.
        • Oh M.
        • Nonaka T.
        • Tsujimoto H.
        • Asano T.
        • Hamanishi C.
        An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004; 420: 213-219https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200403000-00030
        • Alesi D.
        • Marcheggiani Muccioli G.M.
        • Roberti di Sarsina T.
        • Bontempi M.
        • Pizza N.
        • Zinno R.
        • et al.
        In vivo femorotibial kinematics of medial-stabilized total knee arthroplasty correlates to post-operative clinical outcomes.
        Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 491-497https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05975-w
        • Angerame M.R.
        • Holst D.C.
        • Jennings J.M.
        • Komistek R.D.
        • Dennis D.A.
        Total knee arthroplasty kinematics.
        J. Arthroplast. 2019; 34: 2502-2510https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.037
        • Asayama A.
        • Tateuchi H.
        • Yamagata M.
        • Ichihashi N.
        Influence of stance width and toe direction on medial knee contact force during bodyweight squats.
        J. Biomech. 2021; 129110824https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110824
        • Banks S.A.
        • Markovich G.D.
        • Hodge W.A.
        In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties.
        J. Arthroplast. 1997; 12: 297-304https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90026-7
        • Bourne R.B.
        • Chesworth B.M.
        • Davis A.M.
        • Mahomed N.N.
        • Charron K.D.
        Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010; 468: 57-63https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9
        • Cacciola G.
        • Mancino F.
        • De Meo F.
        • Di Matteo V.
        • Sculco P.K.
        • Cavaliere P.
        • et al.
        Mid-term survivorship and clinical outcomes of the medial stabilized systems in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
        J. Orthop. 2021; 24: 157-164https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.022
        • Dennis D.A.
        • Komistek R.D.
        • Colwell Jr., C.E.
        • Ranawat C.S.
        • Scott R.D.
        • Thornhill T.S.
        • et al.
        In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998; 356: 47-57https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199811000-00009
        • Dennis D.A.
        • Komistek R.D.
        • Mahfouz M.R.
        • Haas B.D.
        • Stiehl J.B.
        Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003; 416: 37-57https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000092986.12414.b5
        • Ewald F.C.
        The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1989; 248: 9-12
        • Fan C.Y.
        • Hsieh J.T.
        • Hsieh M.S.
        • Shih Y.C.
        • Lee C.H.
        Primitive results after medial-pivot knee arthroplasties: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.
        J. Arthroplast. 2010; 25: 492-496https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.008
        • Faul F.
        • Erdfelder E.
        • Lang A.G.
        • Buchner A.
        G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
        Behav. Res. Methods. 2007; 39: 175-191https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
        • Freeman M.A.
        • Pinskerova V.
        The movement of the knee studied by magnetic resonance imaging.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003; 410: 35-43https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000063598.67412.0d
        • Freeman M.A.
        • Pinskerova V.
        The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint.
        J. Biomech. 2005; 38: 197-208https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.006
        • Fujimoto E.
        • Sasashige Y.
        • Tomita T.
        • Iwamoto K.
        • Masuda Y.
        • Hisatome T.
        Significant effect of the posterior tibial slope on the weight-bearing, midflexion in vivo kinematics after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
        J. Arthroplast. 2014; 29: 2324-2330https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.018
        • Garcia S.A.
        • Vakula M.N.
        • Holmes S.C.
        • Pamukoff D.N.
        The influence of body mass index and sex on frontal and sagittal plane knee mechanics during walking in young adults.
        Gait Posture. 2021; 83: 217-222https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.10.010
        • Grood E.S.
        • Suntay W.J.
        A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee.
        J. Biomech. Eng. 1983; 105: 136-144https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138397
        • Horiuchi H.
        • Akizuki S.
        • Tomita T.
        • Sugamoto K.
        • Yamazaki T.
        • Shimizu N.
        In vivo kinematic analysis of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending.
        J. Arthroplast. 2012; 27: 1196-1202https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.01.017
        • Hossain F.
        • Patel S.
        • Rhee S.J.
        • Haddad F.S.
        Knee arthroplasty with a medially conforming ball-and-socket tibiofemoral articulation provides better function.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011; 469: 55-63https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1493-3
        • Inui H.
        • Taketomi S.
        • Nakamura K.
        • Takei S.
        • Takeda H.
        • Tanaka S.
        • et al.
        Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty.
        BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 2013; 5: 10https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-5-10
        • Inui H.
        • Taketomi S.
        • Yamagami R.
        • Shirakawa N.
        • Kawaguchi K.
        • Tanaka S.
        The relationship between soft-tissue balance and intraoperative kinematics of guided motion Total knee arthroplasty.
        J. Knee Surg. 2019; 32: 91-96https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1636545
        • Irish S.E.
        • Millward A.J.
        • Wride J.
        • Haas B.M.
        • Shum G.L.
        The effect of closed-kinetic chain exercises and open-kinetic chain exercise on the muscle activity of vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis.
        J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010; 24: 1256-1262https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cf749f
        • Iwaki H.
        • Pinskerova V.
        • Freeman M.A.
        Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br.). 2000; 82: 1189-1195https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.82b8.10717
        • Kellgren J.H.
        • Lawrence J.S.
        Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.
        Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1957; 16: 494-502https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.16.4.494
        • Key S.
        • Scott G.
        • Stammers J.G.
        • Freeman M.A.R.
        • Pinskerova V.
        • Field R.E.
        • et al.
        Does lateral lift-off occur in static and dynamic activity in a medially spherical total knee arthroplasty? A pulsed-fluoroscopic investigation.
        Bone Joint Res. 2019; 8: 207-215https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.85.bjr-2018-0237.r1
        • Kono K.
        • Inui H.
        • Tomita T.
        • Yamazaki T.
        • Taketomi S.
        • Sugamoto K.
        • et al.
        Bicruciate-stabilised total knee arthroplasty provides good functional stability during high-flexion weight-bearing activities.
        Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05375-9
        • Minoda Y.
        • Watanabe K.
        • Iwaki H.
        • Takahashi S.
        • Fukui M.
        • Nakamura H.
        Theoretical risk of anterior femoral cortex notching in total knee arthroplasty using a navigation system.
        J. Arthroplast. 2013; 28: 1533-1537https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.015
        • Nakamura N.
        • Takeuchi R.
        • Sawaguchi T.
        • Ishikawa H.
        • Saito T.
        • Goldhahn S.
        Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Japanese knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS).
        J. Orthop. Sci. 2011; 16: 516-523https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0112-9
        • Nam D.
        • Nunley R.M.
        • Barrack R.L.
        Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern?.
        Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-b: 96-100https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b11.34152
        • Pritchett J.W.
        Patients prefer a bicruciate-retaining or the medial pivot total knee prosthesis.
        J. Arthroplast. 2011; 26: 224-228https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.012
        • Roos E.M.
        • Lohmander L.S.
        The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis.
        Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2003; 1: 64https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-64
        • Scott C.E.
        • Howie C.R.
        • MacDonald D.
        • Biant L.C.
        Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br.). 2010; 92: 1253-1258https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.92b9.24394
        • Scott G.
        • Imam M.A.
        • Eifert A.
        • Freeman M.A.
        • Pinskerova V.
        • Field R.E.
        • et al.
        Can a total knee arthroplasty be both rotationally unconstrained and anteroposteriorly stabilised? A pulsed fluoroscopic investigation.
        Bone Joint Res. 2016; 5: 80-86https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.53.2000621
        • Shimizu N.
        • Tomita T.
        • Yamazaki T.
        • Yoshikawa H.
        • Sugamoto K.
        The effect of weight-bearing condition on kinematics of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis.
        J. Arthroplast. 2011; 26: 1031-1037https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.01.008
        • Shimmin A.
        • Martinez-Martos S.
        • Owens J.
        • Iorgulescu A.D.
        • Banks S.
        Fluoroscopic motion study confirming the stability of a medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty.
        Knee. 2015; 22: 522-526https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.011
        • Steinbrück A.
        • Schröder C.
        • Woiczinski M.
        • Fottner A.
        • Pinskerova V.
        • Müller P.E.
        • et al.
        Femorotibial kinematics and load patterns after total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro comparison of posterior-stabilized versus medial-stabilized design.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016; 33: 42-48https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.02.002
        • Stiehl J.B.
        • Komistek R.D.
        • Dennis D.A.
        • Paxson R.D.
        • Hoff W.A.
        Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br.). 1995; 77: 884-889
        • Tsai T.Y.
        • Liow M.H.L.
        • Li G.
        • Arauz P.
        • Peng Y.
        • Klemt C.
        • et al.
        Bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty does not restore native tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics during gait.
        J. Orthop. Res. 2019; 37: 1929-1937https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24333
        • Victor J.
        • Bellemans J.
        Physiologic kinematics as a concept for better flexion in TKA.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2006; 452: 53-58https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238792.36725.1e
        • Wunschel M.
        • Leichtle U.
        • Obloh C.
        • Wulker N.
        • Muller O.
        The effect of different quadriceps loading patterns on tibiofemoral joint kinematics and patellofemoral contact pressure during simulated partial weight-bearing knee flexion.
        Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 1099-1106https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1359-y
        • Yamazaki T.
        • Watanabe T.
        • Nakajima Y.
        • Sugamoto K.
        • Tomita T.
        • Yoshikawa H.
        • et al.
        Improvement of depth position in 2-D/3-D registration of knee implants using single-plane fluoroscopy.
        IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2004; 23: 602-612https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2004.826051
        • Yamazaki T.
        • Watanabe T.
        • Nakajima Y.
        • Sugamoto K.
        • Tomita T.
        • Maeda D.
        • et al.
        Visualization of femorotibial contact in total knee arthroplasty using X-ray fluoroscopy.
        Eur. J. Radiol. 2005; 53: 84-89https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.09.018
        • Zuffi S.
        • Leardini A.
        • Catani F.
        • Fantozzi S.
        • Cappello A.
        A model-based method for the reconstruction of total knee replacement kinematics.
        IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 1999; 18: 981-991https://doi.org/10.1109/42.811310