Advertisement

Do femoral version abnormalities play a role in hip function of patients with hip pain?

  • Viviane Bortoluzzi Frasson
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Physique – Physical Therapy Center, Rua Furriel Luiz Antônio Vargas, 250, 90470-130 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

    Physique – Physical Therapy Centre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Walter Herzog
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Health Centre, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kelly Johnston
    Affiliations
    McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yves Pauchard
    Affiliations
    McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Marco Aurélio Vaz
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Physique – Physical Therapy Centre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

    Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Bruno Manfredini Baroni
    Affiliations
    Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • Hip internal rotation range of motion is maximized in anteverted hip patients.
      • Hip external rotation range of motion is maximized in retroverted hip patients.
      • Femoral version abnormalities affected hip muscle strength.
      • Rotation index is a strong femoral version predictor.
      • Femoral version should be considered in decision making of patients with hip pain.

      Abstract

      Background

      A high prevalence of femoral version abnormalities has been observed in hip pain patients, with impact on hip range of motion and muscle strength that should be elucidated.

      Methods

      Cross-sectional study. Thirty-one patients with hip pain (16 men and 15 female) were subjected to Biplanar X-Rays to quantify femoral version using three-dimensional measurements. The 62 hips were divided into normal version (10–20°, n = 18), anteverted (>20°, n = 19), and retroverted (<10°, n = 25). Joint range of motion for flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation was assessed through digital goniometry. Maximal isometric hip strength (flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation at 0° and 30°, abduction, adduction) was evaluated through hand-held dynamometry. Hip rotation index was calculated as external rotation minus internal rotation.

      Findings

      Anteverted hips had greater internal rotation, while retroverted hips had greater external rotation (p = 0.001). Anteverted hips were weaker than retroverted hips for external rotation at 30° (p < 0.001), abduction (p = 0.006) and adduction (p < 0.001), and weaker than normal version hips for extension (p = 0.018). All three groups had different rotation index: retroverted>normal>anteverted (p < 0.001). The ordinal logistic regression found higher values of rotation index with higher probability of being retroverted (common odds ratio = 1.20). There was a strong correlation between femoral version group and rotation index (rS = 0.76, p < 0.001). There was probability >70% of a hip being anteverted if the rotation index was <11°, and being retroverted if the index was >40°.

      Interpretation

      Range of motion and muscle strength differed in hips with different femoral versions. The hip rotation index was a strong femoral version predictor.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Audenaert E.A.
        • Peeters I.
        • Vigneron L.
        • Baelde N.
        • Pattyn C.
        Hip morphological characteristics and range of internal rotation in femoroacetabular impingement.
        Am. J. Sports Med. 2012; 40: 1329-1336https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512441328
        • Bedi A.
        • Thompson M.
        • Uliana C.
        • Magennis E.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Assessment of range of motion and contact zones with commonly performed physical exam maneuvers for femoroacetabular impingement: what do these tests mean?.
        Hip Int. 2013; 23-Suppl 9: S27-S34https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000060
        • Botser I.B.
        • Ozoude G.C.
        • Martin D.E.
        • Siddiqi A.J.
        • Kuppuswami S.
        • Domb B.G.
        Femoral anteversion in the hip: comparison of measurement by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination.
        Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 619-627https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.021
        • Casartelli N.
        • Maffiuletti N.
        • Item-Glatthorn J.F.
        Hip muscle weakness in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement.
        Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2011; 19: 816-821https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2011.04.001
        • Cibulka M.T.
        • Strube M.J.
        • Meier D.
        • Selsor M.
        • Wheatley C.
        • Wilson N.G.
        • Irrgang J.J.
        Symmetrical and asymmetrical hip rotation and its relationship to hip rotator muscle strength.
        Clin. Biomech. 2010; 25: 56-62https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.09.006
        • Deschenes S.
        • Charron G.
        • Beaudoin G.
        • Labelle H.
        • Dubois J.
        • Miron M.
        • Parent S.
        Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients’ radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35: 989-994https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdcaa4
        • Diamond L.E.
        • Dobson F.L.
        • Bennell K.L.
        • Wrigley T.V.
        • Hodges P.W.
        • Hinman R.S.
        Physical impairments and activity limitations in people with femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review.
        Br. J. Sports Med. 2015; 49: 230-242https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093340
        • Dick A.G.
        • Houghton J.M.
        • Bankes M.K.
        An approach to hip pain in young adult.
        BMJ. 2018; 361k1086https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1086
        • Ejnisman L.
        • Philippon M.J.
        • Lertwanich P.
        • Pennock A.T.
        • Herzog M.M.
        • Briggs K.K.
        • Ho C.P.
        Relationship between femoral anteversion and findings in hips with femoroacetabular impingement.
        Orthopedics. 2013; 36: e293-e300https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20130222-17
        • Fabricant P.D.
        • Bedi A.
        • De La Torre K.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic psoas lengthening: the effect of femoral version.
        Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 965-971https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.028
        • Fabricant P.D.
        • Fields K.G.
        • Taylor S.A.
        • Magennis E.
        • Bedi A.
        • Kelly B.T.
        The effect of femoral and acetabular version on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement surgery.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2015; 97: 537-543https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00266
        • Frasson V.B.
        • Vaz M.A.
        • Morales A.B.
        • Torresan A.
        • Telöken M.A.
        • Gusmão P.D.F.
        • Crestani M.V.
        • Baroni B.M.
        Hip muscle weakness and reduced joint range of motion in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a case-control study.
        Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2020; 24: 39-45https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.11.010
        • Freeman S.
        • Mascia A.
        • McGill S.
        Arthrogenic neuromusculature inhibition: a foundational investigation of existence in the hip joint.
        Clin. Biomech. 2013; 28: 171-177https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.11.014
        • Freke M.D.
        • Kemp J.
        • Svege I.
        • Risberg M.A.
        • Semciw A.
        • Crossley K.M.
        Physical impairments in symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of the evidence.
        Br. J. Sports Med. 2017; 50: 1118https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096152
        • Ganz R.
        • Parvizi J.
        • Beck M.
        • Leunig M.
        • Nötzli H.
        • Siebenrock K.A.
        Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003; 417: 112-120https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2
        • Ganz R.
        • Leunig M.
        • Leunig-Ganz K.
        • Harris W.H.
        The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2008; 466: 264-272https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z
        • Griffin D.R.
        • Dickenson E.J.
        • O’Donnell J.
        • Agricola R.
        • Awan T.
        • Beck M.
        • Clohisy J.C.
        • Dijkstra H.P.
        • Falvey E.
        • Gimpel M.
        • Hinman R.S.
        • Hölmich P.
        • Kassarjian A.
        • Martin H.D.
        • Martin R.
        • Mather R.C.
        • Philippon M.J.
        • Reiman M.P.
        • Takla A.
        • Thorborg K.
        • Walker S.
        • Weir A.
        • Bennell K.L.
        The Warnick agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement.
        Br. J. Sports Med. 2016; 50: 1169-1176https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096743
        • Griffin D.R.
        • Dickenson E.
        • PDH Wall
        • Achana F.
        • Donovan J.L.
        • Griffin J.
        • Hobson R.
        • Hutchinson C.E.
        • Jepson M.
        • Parsons N.R.
        • Petrou S.
        • Realpe A.
        • Smith J.
        • Foster N.E.
        • FASHIoN Study Group
        Hip arthroscopy versus best conservative care for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (UK FASHIoN): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2018; 391: 2225-2235https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31202-9
        • Hallberg S.
        • Sansone M.
        • Augustsson J.
        Full recovery of hip muscle strength is not achieved at return to sports in patients with femoroacetabular impingement surgery.
        Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2020; 28: 1276-1282https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5337-0
        • Kemp J.L.
        • Mosler A.B.
        • Hart H.
        • Bizzini M.
        • Chang S.
        • Scholes M.J.
        • Semciw A.I.
        • Crossley K.M.
        Improving function in people with hip-related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of physiotherapist-led interventions for hip-related pain.
        Br. J. Sports Med. 2020; 54: 1382-1394
        • Kraeutler M.J.
        • Chadayammuri V.
        • Garabekyan T.
        • Mei-Dan O.
        Femoral version abnormalities significantly outweigh effect of cam impingement on hip internal rotation.
        J. Bone Joint Sur. 2018; 100: 205-210https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00376
        • Kulig K.
        • Andrews J.G.M.S.
        • Hay J.G.
        Human strength curves.
        Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 1984; 12: 417-466
        • Lerch T.D.
        • Todorski I.A.S.
        • Steppacher S.D.
        • Schmaranzer F.
        • Werlen S.F.
        • Siebenrock K.A.
        • Tannast M.
        Prevalence of femoral and acetabular version abnormalities in patients with symptomatic hip disease.
        Am. J. Sports Med. 2018; 46: 122-134https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517726983
        • Loureiro A.
        • Mills P.M.
        • Barrett R.S.
        Muscle weakness in hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review.
        Arthritis Care Res. (Hobo-ken). 2013; 65: 340-352https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21806
        • Mansell N.S.
        • Rhon D.I.
        • Meyer J.
        • Slevin J.M.
        • Marchant B.G.
        Arthroscopic surgery or physical therapy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. a randomized controlled trial with 2 year of follow-up.
        Am. J. Sports Med. 2018; 46: 1306-1314https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517751912
        • Marostica A.D.
        • Pizzolatti A.L.A.
        • Adam G.P.
        • Codonho D.
        • Canella R.P.
        • Ganev G.G.
        Is femoral version associated with changes in hip muscle strength in females with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement?.
        Rev. Bras. Ortop. 2019; 54: 422-427https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1694019
        • Matsuda D.K.
        • Gupta N.
        • Martin H.D.
        Closed intramedullary derotational osteotomy and hip arthroscopy for cam femoroacetabular impingement from femoral retroversion.
        Arthrosc. Tech. 2014; 3: e83-e88https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2013.08.013
        • Mohtadi N.G.
        • Griffin D.R.
        • Pedersen M.E.
        • Chan D.
        • Safran M.R.
        • Parsons N.
        • Sekiya J.K.
        • Kelly B.T.
        • Werle J.R.
        • Leunig M.
        • JC McCathy
        • Martin H.D.
        • Thomas Byrd J.W.
        • Philippon M.J.
        • Martin R.L.
        • Guanche C.A.
        • Clohisy J.C.
        • Sampson T.G.
        • Kocher M.S.
        • Larson C.M.
        • Multicenter Arthroscopy of Hip Outcomes Research Network
        The development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the international hip outcome tool (iHOT-33).
        J. Arthrosc. 2012; 28: 595-605https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.013
        • Neumann D.A.
        Kinesiology of the hip: a focus on muscular actions.
        JOSPT. 2010; 40: 82-94https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2010.3025
        • Pomerantz M.L.
        • Glaser D.
        • Doan J.
        • Kumar S.
        • Edmonds E.W.
        Three-dimensional biplanar radiography as a new means of accessing femoral version: a comparative study of EOS three-dimensional radiography versus computed tomography.
        Skelet. Radiol. 2015; 44: 255-260https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-2031-2
        • Rosskopf A.B.
        • Ramseier L.E.
        • Sutter R.
        • Pfirrmann C.W.A.
        • Buck F.M.
        Femoral and tibial torsion measurement in children and adolescents: comparison of 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiography and low-dose CT.
        AJR. 2014; 202: W285-W291https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11103
        • Siebenrock K.A.
        • Steppacher S.D.
        • Haefeli P.C.
        • Schwab J.M.
        • Tannast M.
        Valgus hip with high antetorsion causes pain through posterior extraarticular FAI.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013; 471: 3774-3780https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2895-9
        • Song K.
        • Gaffney B.M.M.
        • Shelburne K.B.
        • Pascual-Garrido C.
        • Clohisy J.C.
        • Harris M.D.
        Dysplastic hip anatomy alters muscle moment arm lengths, lines of action, and contributions to joint reaction forces during gait.
        J. Biomech. 2020; 18: 110https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109968
        • Souza R.B.
        • Powers C.M.
        Concurrent criterion-related validity and reliability of a clinical test to measure femoral anteversion.
        JOSPT. 2009; 39: 586-592https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.2996
        • Sutter R.
        • Dietrich T.J.
        • Zingg P.O.
        • Pfirrmann C.W.A.
        Femoral antetorsion: comparing asymptomatic volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
        Radiol. 2012; 263: 475-483https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12111903
        • Torresan A.
        Reprodutibilidade intra e interavalidor na avaliação funcional do quadril - Intra and inter-rater reliability in hip functional assessment [MSc dissertation].
        Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil2017
        • Uding A.
        • Bloom N.J.
        • Commean P.K.
        • Hillen T.J.
        • Patterson J.D.
        • Clohisy J.C.
        • Harris-Hayes M.
        Clinical test to determine femoral version category in people with chronic hip joint and asymptomatic controls.
        Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract. 2019; 39: 115-122https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2018.12.003