Advertisement

Development and evaluation of a numerical spine model comprising intra-abdominal pressure for use in assessing physiological changes on abdominal compliance and spinal stability

  • Ibrahim El Bojairami
    Affiliations
    Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

    Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Natasha Jacobson
    Affiliations
    Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

    Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mark Driscoll
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

    Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • Compliance showed to be inversely proportional to elasticity, thickness, and radius.
      • Dangerously low compliance levels result from thickening abdominal fat layers.
      • Android obesity associates with poor elasticity and high wall thickness.
      • Gynoid obesity associates with poor elasticity and a more elliptical abdominal perimeter.
      • Active augmentation of abdominal pressure increases static spinal stability.

      Abstract

      Background

      Abdominal compliance is the “measure of ease of abdominal expansion” and determines whether a patient can withstand high intra-abdominal pressures. Thus, high compliance indicates that the abdomen can expand relatively freely, while low compliance restricts abdominal expansion. The global objective of the present work is to evaluate the effect of physiological changes on abdominal compliance using a comprehensive spine finite element model inclusive of intra-abdominal pressure.

      Methods

      The effect of changing Young's modulus, abdominal wall thickness, and abdominal radii on abdominal compliance were evaluated. Intra-abdominal pressure and thoracolumbar fascia forces were also evaluated to assess abdominal physiological changes effects on overall static spinal stability.

      Findings

      Results showed that as wall thickness increased, compliance decreased. Similar findings were made with an increase in abdominal radius and Young's modulus. Furthermore, the active reduction in compliance, caused by increased elasticity and abdominal radius, resulted in an increase in spinal supportive forces originating from the thoracolumbar fascia and intra-abdominal pressurization, along with an increase in spine displacement from its original stable position. There was no clear stability trend for the case of changing abdominal wall thickness as fluctuations were present.

      Interpretation

      Investigated mechanics and data trends suggested that dangerously low compliance levels might result from poor abdominal elasticity and thickening fat layers. This led to a direct discussion and recommendations for obesity conditions and laparoscopy applications. Lastly, static spinal stability showed to improve through increasing active abdominal compliance by means of actively engaging abdominal pressure, hence augmenting abdominal active elasticity.

      Graphical abstract

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Abu-Rafea B.
        • Vilos G.A.
        • Vilos A.G.
        • Hollett-Caines J.
        • Al-Omran M.
        Effect of body habitus and parity on insufflated CO2 volume at various intraabdominal pressures during laparoscopic access in women.
        J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2006; 13: 205-210https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2006.02.004
        • Arjmand N.
        • Shirazi-Adl A.
        Role of intra-abdominal pressure in the unloading and stabilization of the human spine during static lifting tasks.
        Eur. Spine J. 2006; 15: 1265-1275https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0012-9
        • Arjmand N.
        • Shirazi-Adl A.
        • Parnianpour M.
        A finite element model study on the role of trunk muscles in generating intra-abdominal pressure.
        Biomed. Eng. Appl. Basis Commun. 2001; 13: 181-189
      1. ASME Standard Subcommittee V&V 40, 2018. Verification and Validation for Computational Modeling of Medical Devices. http://go.asme.org/VnV40Committee.

        • Aspden R.M.
        Intra-abdominal pressure and its role in spinal mechanics.
        Clin. Biomech. 1987; 2: 168-174https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(87)90010-6
        • Blaser A.R.
        • Björck M.
        • De Keulenaer B.
        • Regli A.
        Abdominal compliance: a bench-to-bedside review.
        J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015; 78: 1044-1053https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000616
        • Chi H.
        • Talischi C.
        • Lopez-Pamies O.
        • Paulino H.G.
        Polygonal finite elements for finite elasticity.
        Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2015; 101: 305-328https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4802
        • Cobb W.S.
        • Burns J.M.
        • Kercher K.W.
        • Matthews B.D.
        • James Norton H.
        • Todd Heniford B.
        Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults.
        J. Surg. Res. 2005; 129: 231-235https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.06.015
        • Daggfeldt K.
        • Thorstensson A.
        The role of intra-abdominal pressure in spinal unloading.
        J. Biomech. 1997; 30: 1149-1155https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00096-1
        • De Keulenaer B.L.
        • De Waele J.J.
        • Powell B.
        • Malbrain M.L.N.G.
        What is normal intra-abdominal pressure and how is it affected by positioning, body mass and positive end-expiratory pressure?.
        Intensive Care Med. 2009; 35: 969-976https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1445-0
        • Deeken C.R.
        • Lake S.P.
        Mechanical properties of the abdominal wall and biomaterials utilized for hernia repair.
        J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017; 74: 411-427https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.008
        • Dietrich M.
        • Kedzior K.
        • Zagrajek T.
        Modeling of muscle action and stability of the human spine.
        in: Multiple Muscle Systems. Springer, 1990: 451-460
        • Driscoll M.
        Fascia – the unsung hero of spine biomechanics.
        J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2018; 22: 90-91https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.10.014
        • El Bojairami I.
        • Driscoll M.
        Formulation and exploration of novel, intramuscular pressure based, muscle activation strategies in a spine model.
        Comput. Biol. Med. 2022; 146105646https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105646
        • El Bojairami I.
        • Driscoll M.
        Coordination between trunk muscles, thoracolumbar fascia, and intra-abdominal pressure toward static spine stability.
        Spine. 2022; 47: E423-E431https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004223
        • El Bojairami I.
        • Driscoll M.
        Correlating skeletal muscle output force and intramuscular pressure via a 3-dimensional finite element muscle model.
        J. Biomech. Eng. 2022; 144041006https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052885
        • El Bojairami I.
        • El-Monajjed K.
        • Driscoll M.
        Development and validation of a timely and representative finite element human spine model for biomechanical simulations.
        Sci. Rep. 2020; 10: 1-15https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77469-1
        • El Bojairami I.
        • Hamedzadeh A.
        • Driscoll M.
        Feasibility of extracting tissue material properties via cohesive elements: a finite element approach to probe insertion procedures in non-invasive spine surgeries.
        Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2021; 59: 2051-2061https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02432-9
        • El Ouaaid Z.
        • Shirazi-Adl A.
        • Plamondon A.
        • Larivière C.
        Trunk strength, muscle activity and spinal loads in maximum isometric flexion and extension exertions: a combined in vivo-computational study.
        J. Biomech. 2013; 46: 2228-2235https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.018
        • El-Monajjed K.
        • Driscoll M.
        A finite element analysis of the intra-abdominal pressure and paraspinal muscle compartment pressure interaction through the thoracolumbar fascia.
        Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 2020; 23: 585-596https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1752682
        • El-Monajjed K.
        • Driscoll M.
        Investigation of reaction forces in the thoracolumbar fascia during different activities: a mechanistic numerical study.
        Life. 2021; 11779https://doi.org/10.3390/life11080779
        • Gere J.M.
        • Timoshenko S.
        Mechanics of Materials.
        Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, CA2001: 815-839
        • Goldman J.M.
        • Rose L.S.
        • Morgan M.D.L.
        • Denison D.M.
        Measurement of abdominal wall compliance in normal subjects and tetraplegic patients.
        Thorax. 1986; 41: 513-518https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.41.7.513
        • Gracovetsky S.
        • Farfan H.F.
        • Lamy C.
        The mechanism of the lumbar spine.
        Spine. 1981; 6: 249-262https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198105000-00007
        • Helewa A.
        • Goldsmith C.H.
        • Lee P.
        • Smythe H.A.
        • Forwell L.
        Does strengthening the abdominal muscles prevent low back pain - a randomized controlled trial.
        J. Rheumatol. 1999; 26: 1808-1815
        • Hodges P.W.
        • Cresswell A.G.
        • Daggfeldt K.
        • Thorstensson A.
        In vivo measurement of the effect of intra-abdominal pressure on the human spine.
        J. Biomech. 2001; 34: 347-353https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00206-2
        • Hosford W.F.
        Mechanical Behavior Of Materials.
        Second edition. 2009
      2. Meijer, G. Development of a non-fusion scoliosis correction device. Numerical modelling of scoliosis correction. University of Twente. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036532297.

        • Mulier J.P.
        • Dillemans B.
        • Crombach M.
        • Missant C.
        • Sels A.
        On the abdominal pressure volume relationship.
        Internet J. Anaesthesiol. 2009; 21: 5221-5231
        • Malbrain M.L.N.G.
        • et al.
        The role of abdominal compliance, the neglected parameter in critically ill patients - a consensus review of 16. Part 1: definitions and pathophysiology.
        Anaesthesiol. Intensive Ther. 2014; 46: 392-405https://doi.org/10.5603/AIT.2014.0062, hdl.handle.net/1765/90194
        • Malbrain M.L.N.G.
        • Peeters Y.
        • Wise R.
        The neglected role of abdominal compliance in organ-organ interactions.
        Crit. Care. 2016; 20: 1-10https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1220-x
        • McDougall E.M.
        • Figenshau R.S.
        • Clayman R.V.
        • Monk T.G.
        • Smith D.S.
        Laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum: impact of body habitus.
        J. Laparoendosc. Surg. 1994; 4: 385-391https://doi.org/10.1089/lps.1994.4.385
        • O’Sullivan P.
        • Twomey L.
        • Allison G.
        • Sinclair J.
        • Miller K.
        • Knox J.
        Altered patterns of abdominal muscle activation in patients with chronic low back pain.
        Aust. J. Physiother. 1997; 43: 91-98https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60403-7
        • Ott D.E.
        Abdominal compliance and laparoscopy: a review.
        J. Soc. Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2019; 23e2018.00080https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00080
        • Papavramidis T.S.
        • Michalopoulos N.A.
        • Mistriotis G.
        • Pliakos I.G.
        • Kesisoglou I.I.
        • Papavramidis S.T.
        Abdominal compliance, linearity between abdominal pressure and ascitic fluid volume.
        J. Emergencies, Trauma Shock. 2011; 4: 194-197https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.82205
        • Parashar S.K.
        • Sharma J.K.
        A review on application of finite element modelling in bone biomechanics.
        Perspect. Sci. 2016; 8: 696-698https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.06.062
        • Peter Reeves N.
        • Narendra K.S.
        • Cholewicki J.
        Spine stability: the six blind men and the elephant.
        Clin. Biomech. 2007; 22: 266-274https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.11.011
        • Reintam Blaser A.
        • et al.
        Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients - a prospective multicenter study (IROI study).
        Crit. Care Med. 2019; 47: 535-542https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003623
        • Roberts D.J.
        • De Waele J.J.
        • Kirkpatrick A.W.
        • Malbrain M.L.N.G.
        Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome.
        in: Surgical Intensive Care Medicine. Third edition. Springer, 2016: 621-644
        • Sanders J.L.
        An Improved First-Approximation Theory for Thin Shells.
        1959
        • Sharma M.
        • Langrana N.A.
        • Rodriguez J.
        Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 887-900https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199504150-00003
        • Song C.
        • Alijani A.
        • Frank T.
        • Hanna G.B.
        • Cuschieri A.
        Mechanical properties of the human abdominal wall measured in vivo during insufflation for laparoscopic surgery.
        Surg. Endosc. Other Interv. Tech. 2006; 20: 987-990
        • Song C.
        • Alijani A.
        • Frank T.
        • Hanna G.
        • Cuschieri A.
        Elasticity of the living abdominal wall in laparoscopic surgery.
        J. Biomech. 2006; 39: 587-591
        • Stokes I.A.F.
        • Gardner-Morse M.
        Quantitative anatomy of the lumbar musculature.
        J. Biomech. 1999; 32: 311-316https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00164-X
        • Stokes I.A.F.
        • Gardner-Morse M.G.
        • Henry S.M.
        Abdominal muscle activation increases lumbar spinal stability: analysis of contributions of different muscle groups.
        Clin. Biomech. 2011; 26: 797-803https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.04.006
        • Sturini E.
        • Saporito A.
        • Sugrue M.
        • Parr M.J.A.
        • Bishop G.
        • Braschi A.
        Respiratory variation of intra-abdominal pressure: indirect indicator of abdominal compliance?.
        Intensive Care Med. 2008; 34: 1632-1637https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1155-z
        • Tayebi S.
        • et al.
        A concise overview of non-invasive intra-abdominal pressure measurement techniques: from bench to bedside.
        J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2021; 35: 51-70https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00561-4
        • Taylor C.A.
        • Hughes T.J.R.
        • Zarins C.K.
        Finite element modeling of three-dimensional pulsatile flow in the abdominal aorta: relevance to atherosclerosis.
        Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1998; 26: 975-987https://doi.org/10.1114/1.140
        • Tongyoo A.
        • Chatthamrak P.
        • Sriussadaporn E.
        • Limpavitayaporn P.
        • Mingmalairak C.
        Risk assessment of abdominal wall thickness measured on pre-operative computerized tomography for incisional surgical site infection after abdominal surgery.
        J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 2015; 98: 677-683
        • Viceconti M.
        • Olsen S.
        • Burton K.
        Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations.
        Clin. Biomech. 2005; 20: 451-454https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.01.010
        • Willard F.H.
        • Vleeming A.
        • Schuenke M.D.
        • Danneels L.
        • Schleip R.
        The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations.
        J. Anat. 2012; 221: 507-536https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x
        • Yoshino O.
        • Quail A.
        • Oldmeadow C.
        • Balogh Z.J.
        The interpretation of intra-abdominal pressures from animal models: the rabbit to human example.
        Injury. 2012; 43: 169-173https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.04.011