Advertisement

Interpreting the tilt-and-torsion method to express shoulder joint kinematics

  • Félix Chénier
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Physical Activity Science, UQAM, Biological Sciences Building, Office SB-4455, Université du Québec à Montréal, P.O. Box 8888, Station Centreville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3P8, Canada.
    Affiliations
    Mobility and Adaptive Sports Research Lab, Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada

    Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ilona Alberca
    Affiliations
    Université de Toulon, Impact de l'Activité Physique sur la Santé (UR IAPS n°201723207F), Campus de La Garde, CS60584, F-83041 Toulon, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Arnaud Faupin
    Affiliations
    Université de Toulon, Impact de l'Activité Physique sur la Santé (UR IAPS n°201723207F), Campus de La Garde, CS60584, F-83041 Toulon, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dany H. Gagnon
    Affiliations
    Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada

    School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • The ISB advises reporting shoulder orientation using an Euler YXY angle sequence.
      • Euler YXY has a humeral rotation bias and fails in non-elevated shoulder.
      • The Tilt-and-Torsion method is simpler to understand and may solve these problems.
      • We confirm that Tilt-and-Torsion angles are coherent in sports wheelchair propulsion.
      • We confirm that Tilt-and-Torsion correctly reports rotation in gimbal lock position.

      Abstract

      Background

      Kinematics is studied by practitioners and researchers in different fields of practice. It is therefore critically important to adhere to a taxonomy that explicitly describes positions and movements. However, current representation methods such as cardan and Euler angles fail to report shoulder angles in a way that is easily and correctly interpreted by practitioners, and that is free from numerical instability such as gimbal lock.

      Methods

      In this paper, we comprehensively describe the recent Tilt-and-Torsion method and compare it to the Euler YXY method currently recommended by the International Society of Biomechanics. While using the same three rotations (plane of elevation, elevation, humeral rotation), the Tilt-and-Torsion method reports humeral rotation independently from the plane of elevation. We assess how it can be used to describe shoulder angles (1) in a simulated assessment of humeral rotation with the arm at the side, which constitutes a gimbal lock position, and (2) during an experimental functional task, with 10 wheelchair basketball athletes who sprint in straight line using a sports wheelchair.

      Findings

      In the simulated gimbal lock experiment, the Tilt-and-Torsion method provided both humeral elevation and rotation measurements, contrary to the Euler YXY method. During the wheelchair sprints, humeral rotation ranged from 14° (externally) to 13° (internally), which is consistent with typical maximal ranges of humeral rotation, compared to 65° to 50° with the Euler YXY method.

      Interpretation

      Based on our results, we recommend that shoulder angles be expressed using Tilt-and-Torsion angles instead of Euler YXY.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • An K.-N.
        • Browne A.O.
        • Korinek S.
        • Tanaka S.
        • Morrey B.F.
        Three-dimensional kinematics of glenohumeral elevation.
        J. Orthop. Res. 1991; 9: 143-149https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100090117
        • Barnes C.J.
        • Van Steyn S.J.
        • Fischer R.A.
        The effects of age, sex, and shoulder dominance on range of motion of the shoulder.
        J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2001; 10: 242-246https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2001.115270
        • Boninger M.L.
        • Cooper R.A.
        • Shimada S.D.
        • Rudy T.E.
        Shoulder and elbow motion during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion: a description using a local coordinate system.
        Spinal Cord: Off. J. Int. Med. Soc. Paraplegia. 1998; 36: 418-426https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100588
        • Bonnefoy-Mazure A.
        • Slawinski J.
        • Riquet A.
        • Lévèque J.-M.
        • Miller C.
        • Chèze L.
        Rotation sequence is an important factor in shoulder kinematics. Application to the elite players’ flat serves.
        J. Biomech. 2010; 43: 2022-2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.028
        • Browne A.
        • Hoffmeyer P.
        • Tanaka S.
        • An K.
        • Morrey B.
        Glenohumeral elevation studied in three dimensions.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. British. 1990; 72-B: 843-845https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B5.2211768
        • Campeau-Lecours A.
        • Vu D.-S.
        • Schweitzer F.
        • Roy J.-S.
        Alternative representation of the shoulder orientation based on the tilt-and-torsion angles.
        J. Biomech. Eng. 2020; 142 (074504)https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046203
        • Collinger J.L.
        • Boninger M.L.
        • Koontz A.M.
        • Price R.
        • Sisto S.A.
        • Tolerico M.L.
        • Cooper R.A.
        Shoulder biomechanics during the push phase of wheelchair propulsion: a multisite study of persons with paraplegia.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2008; 89: 667-676
        • Cooper R.A.
        • Boninger M.L.
        • Shimada S.D.
        • Lawrence B.M.
        Glenohumeral joint kinematics and kinetics for three coordinate system representations during wheelchair propulsion.
        Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1999; 78: 435-446
        • Crespo-Ruiz B.
        • del Ama-Espinosa A.
        • Gil-Agudo Á.
        Relation between kinematic analysis of wheelchair propulsion and wheelchair functional basketball classification.
        Adapt. Phys. Activ. Quart.: APAQ. 2011; 28: 157-172https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.28.2.157
        • Davis J.L.
        • Growney E.S.
        • Johnson M.E.
        • Iuliano B.A.
        • An K.N.
        Three-dimensional kinematics of the shoulder complex during wheelchair propulsion: a technical report.
        Bull. Prosthet. Res. 1998; 35: 61-72
        • de Groot J.H.
        The variability of shoulder motions recorded by means of palpation.
        Clin. Biomech. 1997; 12: 461-472https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(97)00031-4
        • Doorenbosch C.A.M.
        • Harlaar J.
        • Veeger D.(.H.E.J.).
        The globe system: An unambiguous description of shoulder positions in daily life movements.
        J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 2003; 40: 149https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2003.03.0149
        • Gerhardt J.J.
        Clinical measurements of joint motion and position in the neutral-zero method and SFTR recording: basic principles.
        Int. Rehab. Med. 1983; 5: 161-164https://doi.org/10.3109/03790798309167039
        • Lafta H.A.
        • Guppy R.
        • Whatling G.
        • Holt C.
        Impact of rear wheel axle position on upper limb kinematics and electromyography during manual wheelchair use.
        Int. Biomech. 2018; 5: 17-29https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1457983
        • Phadke V.
        • Braman J.P.
        • LaPrade R.F.
        • Ludewig P.M.
        Comparison of glenohumeral motion using different rotation sequences.
        J. Biomech. 2011; 44: 700-705https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.042
        • Rab G.T.
        Shoulder motion description: the ISB and globe methods are identical.
        Gait Posture. 2008; 27: 702-705https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.003
        • Rab G.
        • Petuskey K.
        • Bagley A.
        A method for determination of upper extremity kinematics.
        Gait Posture. 2002; 15: 113-119https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00155-2
        • Rao S.S.
        • Bontrager E.L.
        • Gronley J.K.
        • Newsam C.J.
        • Perry J.
        Three-dimensional kinematics of wheelchair propulsion.
        IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 1996; 4: 152-160
        • Rundquist P.J.
        • Anderson D.D.
        • Guanche C.A.
        • Ludewig P.M.
        Shoulder Kinematics in Subjects With Frozen Shoulder. 2003; 84: 7
        • Šenk M.
        • Chèze L.
        Rotation sequence as an important factor in shoulder kinematics.
        Clin. Biomech. 2006; 21: S3-S8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.09.007
        • Tsai C.-Y.
        • Lin C.-J.
        • Huang Y.-C.
        • Lin P.-C.
        • Su F.-C.
        The effects of rear-wheel camber on the kinematics of upper extremity during wheelchair propulsion.
        Biomed. Eng. Online. 2012; 11: 87https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-11-87
        • van der Helm F.C.
        A standardized protocol for motion recordings of the shoulder.
        in: Shaker Publishers B.V. First Conference of the International Shoulder Group. Delft University of Technology The Netherlands, 1997: 7-12
        • van der Helm F.C.T.
        • Pronk G.M.
        Three-dimensional recording and description of motions of the shoulder mechanism.
        J. Biomech. Eng. 1995; 117: 27-40https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2792267
        • Wang X.
        • Maurin M.
        • Mazet F.
        • Maia N.D.C.
        • Voinot K.
        • Verriest J.P.
        • Fayet M.
        Three-dimensional modelling of the motion range of axial rotation of the upper arm.
        J. Biomech. 1998; 31: 899-908https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00098-0
        • Woltring H.J.
        3-d attitude representation of human joints: a standardization proposal.
        J. Dent. Biomech. 1994; 27: 1399-1414
        • Wu G.
        • Van Der Helm F.C.T.
        • Veeger H.E.J.D.
        • Makhsous M.
        • Van Roy P.
        • Anglin C.
        • Nagels J.
        • Karduna A.R.
        • McQuade K.
        • Wang X.
        • Werner F.W.
        • Buchholz B.
        • et al.
        ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion - part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.
        J. Biomech. 2005; 38: 981-992https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042