Advertisement

Gait termination on a declined surface in trans-femoral amputees: Impact of using microprocessor-controlled limb system

      Highlights

      • When terminating gait, negative limb work is done to arrest centre-of-mass velocity.
      • Investigated negative limb work done to halt ramp descent in transfemoral amputees
      • Determined how microprocessor limb-system affected negative work done by each limb
      • Increase in prosthetic side work suggests participants more assured using prosthesis.
      • Suggests limb system should facilitate locomotion over changing terrains.

      Abstract

      Background

      Walking down ramps is a demanding task for transfemoral-amputees and terminating gait on ramps is even more challenging because of the requirement to maintain a stable limb so that it can do the necessary negative mechanical work on the centre-of-mass in order to arrest (dissipate) forward/downward velocity. We determined how the use of a microprocessor-controlled limb system (simultaneous control over hydraulic resistances at ankle and knee) affected the negative mechanical work done by each limb when transfemoral-amputees terminated gait during ramp descent.

      Methods

      Eight transfemoral-amputees completed planned gait terminations (stopping on prosthesis) on a 5-degree ramp from slow and customary walking speeds, with the limb's microprocessor active or inactive. When active the limb operated in its ‘ramp-descent’ mode and when inactive the knee and ankle devices functioned at constant default levels. Negative limb work, determined as the integral of the negative mechanical (external) limb power during the braking phase, was compared across speeds and microprocessor conditions.

      Findings

      Negative work done by each limb increased with speed (p < 0.001), and on the prosthetic limb it was greater when the microprocessor was active compared to inactive (p = 0.004). There was no change in work done across microprocessor conditions on the intact limb (p = 0.35).

      Interpretation

      Greater involvement of the prosthetic limb when the limb system was active indicates its ramp-descent mode effectively altered the hydraulic resistances at the ankle and knee. Findings highlight participants became more assured using their prosthetic limb to arrest centre-of-mass velocity.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Abdulhasan, Z.M.,Buckley, J.G., Gait Termination on Declined Compared to Level Surface; Contribution of Terminating and Trailing Limb Work in Arresting Center of Mass Velocity. (In review)

        • Agrawal V.
        • Gailey R.S.
        • Gaunaurd I.A.
        • O'Toole C.
        • Finnieston A.
        • Tolchin R.
        Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.
        Prosthetics Orthot. Int. 2015; 39: 380-389
        • Bell E.M.
        • Pruziner A.L.
        • Wilken J.M.
        • Wolf E.J.
        Performance of conventional and X2® prosthetic knees during slope descent.
        Clin. Biomech. 2016; 33: 26-31
        • Bellmann M.
        • Schmalz T.
        • Blumentritt S.
        Comparative biomechanical analysis of current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2010; 91: 644-652
        • Bellmann M.
        • Schmalz T.
        • Ludwigs E.
        • Blumentritt S.
        Immediate effects of a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint: a comparative biomechanical evaluation.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012; 93: 541-549
        • British Standards
        Institution Code of Practice for the Design of Buildings and their Approaches to meet the Needs of Disabled People BSI.
        2009
        • Burnfield J.M.
        • Eberly V.J.
        • Gronely J.K.
        • Perry J.
        • Yule W.J.
        • Mulroy S.J.
        Impact of stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on ramp negotiation and community walking function in K2 level transfemoral amputees.
        Prosthetics Orthot. Int. 2012; 36: 95-104
        • Cappozzo A.
        • Catani F.
        • Della Croce U.
        • Leardini A.
        Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination.
        Clin. Biomech. 1995; 10: 171-178
        • Cham R.
        • Redfern M.S.
        Changes in gait when anticipating slippery floors.
        Gait Posture. 2002; 15: 159-171
        • De Asha A.R.
        • Johnson L.
        • Munjal R.
        • Kulkarni J.
        • Buckley J.G.
        Attenuation of centre-of-pressure trajectory fluctuations under the prosthetic foot when using an articulating hydraulic ankle attachment compared to fixed attachment.
        Clin. Biomech. 2013; 28: 218-224
        • Donelan J.M.
        • Kram R.
        • Kuo A.D.
        Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking.
        J. Exp. Biol. 2002; 205: 3717-3727
        • Fradet L.
        • Alimusaj M.
        • Braatz F.
        • Wolf S.I.
        Biomechanical analysis of ramp ambulation of transtibial amputees with an adaptive ankle foot system.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 32: 191-198
        • Franz J.R.
        • Lyddon N.E.
        • Kram R.
        Mechanical work performed by the individual legs during uphill and downhill walking.
        J. Biomech. 2012; 45: 257-262
        • Geil M.D.
        • Parnianpour M.
        • Quesada P.
        • Berme N.
        • Simon S.
        Comparison of methods for the calculation of energy storage and return in a dynamic elastic response prosthesis.
        J. Biomech. 2000; 33: 1745-1750
        • Hafner B.J.
        • Willingham L.L.
        • Buell N.C.
        • Allyn K.J.
        • Smith D.G.
        Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2007; 88: 207-217
        • Highsmith M.J.
        • Kahle J.T.
        • Miro R.M.
        • Mengelkoch L.J.
        Ramp descent performance with the C-Leg and interrater reliability of the Hill assessment index.
        Prosthetics Orthot. Int. 2013; 37: 362-368
        • Highsmith M.J.
        • Kahle J.T.
        • Lura D.J.
        • Lewandowski A.L.
        • Quillen W.S.
        • Kim S.H.
        Stair ascent and ramp gait training with the Genium knee.
        Technol Innov. 2014; 15: 349-358
        • Huang H.
        • Crouch D.L.
        • Liu M.
        • Sawicki G.S.
        • Wang D.
        A cyber expert system for auto-tuning powered prosthesis impedance control parameters.
        Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2016; 44: 1613-1624
        • van Keeken H.G.
        • Vrieling A.H.
        • Hof A.L.
        • Postema K.
        • Otten B.
        Controlling horizontal deceleration during gait termination in transfemoral amputees: measurements and simulations.
        Med. Eng. Phys. 2013; 35: 583-590
        • Kuster M.
        • Sakurai S.
        • Wood G.A.
        Kinematic and kinetic comparison of downhill and level walking.
        Clin. Biomech. 1995; 10: 79-84
        • Lay A.N.
        • Hass C.J.
        • Gregor R.J.
        The effects of sloped surfaces on locomotion: a kinematic and kinetic analysis.
        J. Biomech. 2006; 39: 1621-1628
        • Liu M.
        • Zhang F.
        • Datseris P.
        • Huang H.H.
        Improving finite state impedance control of active-transfemoral prosthesis using dempster-Shafer based state transition rules.
        J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2014; 76: 461-474
        • Lura D.J.
        • Wernke M.M.
        • Carey S.L.
        • Kahle J.T.
        • Miro R.M.
        • Highsmith M.J.
        Differences in knee flexion between the Genium and C-Leg microprocessor knees while walking on level ground and ramps.
        Clin. Biomech. 2015; 30: 175-181
        • Redfern M.S.
        • DiPasquale J.
        Biomechanics of descending ramps.
        Gait Posture. 1997; 6: 119-125
        • Sawers A.B.
        • Hafner B.J.
        Outcomes associated with the use of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees among individuals with unilateral transfemoral limb loss: a systematic review.
        JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 2013; 25 (P4-P40)
        • Schwartz M.H.
        • Rozumalski A.
        A new method for estimating joint parameters from motion data.
        J. Biomech. 2005; 38: 107-116
        • Struchkov V.
        • Buckley J.G.
        Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
        Clin. Biomech. 2015; 32: 164-170
        • Sup IV, F.C.
        A Powered Self-contained Knee and Ankle Prosthesis for near Normal Gait in Transfemoral Amputees.
        Vanderbilt University, 2009
        • Villa C.
        • Drevelle X.
        • Bonnet X.
        • Lavaste F.
        • Loiret I.
        • Fode P.
        • Pillet H.
        Evolution of vaulting strategy during locomotion of individuals with transfemoral amputation on slopes and cross-slopes compared to level walking.
        Clin. Biomech. 2015; 30: 623-628
        • Vrieling A.H.
        • van Keeken H.G.
        • Schoppen T.
        • Otten E.
        • Halbertsma J.P.
        • Hof A.L.
        • Postema K.
        Uphill and downhill walking in unilateral lower limb amputees.
        Gait Posture. 2008; 28: 235-242