Biomechanical research on contour cage with transacetabular screws fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty


      • Initial stability of Contour cup is achieved by bone allograft and flange screws.
      • Transacetabular screw could not improve initial stability.
      • Transacetabular screw improves strain distribution and long-term outcome.



      Use biomechanical technique to access the strain distribution and stability of Contour anti-protrusion cage with or without the whole circumference acetabular cup fixation by the transacetabular screws.


      Pelvic specimens from 10 male cadavers were used for the biomechanical test. The models of type C bone defect were copied according to the AAOS classification. Group 1: the contour reconstruction ring was fixed only by flange screws; Group 2: the contour reconstruction ring was fixed both by flange screws and transacetabular screws in dome. Under load in Heel Strike, Midstance, and Toe off phase, the transverse and longitudinal strains were measured in both the superior measure site near the root of the iliac wing and the inferior measure site near the root of the ischium. The relative displacement between the anterior inferior spine and the root of ischium below acetabular component was also measured.


      Compared with Group 1, the transverse and longitudinal pressure strain of Group 2 on the superior measure site decreased, and measure sites also showed reductions on the inferior under load under three different gait phases. The result of mean relative displacement showed transacetabular screws fixation couldn't provide significant improvement of displacement prevention.


      Biomechanical test showed that under the premise of a satisfied bone allograft and well-fixed flange screws in iliac and ischium, the satisfactory initial stability of the reconstruction cup can be achieved, but could not be improved by transacetabular screw technique. However, the max strain in root part of the flange will be reduced using transacetabular screws in ilium, pubis and ischium together, and the strain distribution will also be improved.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Berry D.J.
        Acetabular anti-protrusio rings and cages in revision total hip arthroplasty.
        Semin. Arthroplast. 1995; 6: 68-75
        • Bohm P.
        • Banzhaf S.
        Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3–13 years.
        Acta Orthop. Scand. 1999; 70: 240-249
        • Bostrom M.P.
        • Lehman A.P.
        • Buly R.L.
        • Lyman S.
        • Nestor B.J.
        Acetabular revision with the Contour antiprotrusio cage: 2- to 5-year followup.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2006; 453: 188-194
        • Carvalho J.W.
        • Carvalho F.A.
        • Batista T.
        • Santiago P.S.
        • Tabak M.
        Cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) effect on the thermal stability of oxy-HbGp: dynamic light scattering (DLS) and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) studies.
        Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces. 2014; 118: 14-24
        • Clohisy J.C.
        • Harris W.H.
        The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1999; 81: 66-73
        • Della Valle C.J.
        • Berger R.A.
        • Rosenberg A.G.
        • Galante J.O.
        Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004; : 96-100
        • Goodman S.
        • Saastamoinen H.
        • Shasha N.
        • Gross A.
        Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty.
        J. Arthroplast. 2004; 19: 436-446
        • Hadjari M.H.
        • Hollis J.M.
        • Hofmann O.E.
        • Flahiff C.M.
        • Nelson C.L.
        Initial stability of porous coated acetabular implants. The effect of screw placement, screw tightness, defect type, and oversize implants.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1994; : 117-123
        • Hallstrom B.R.
        • Golladay G.J.
        • Vittetoe D.A.
        • Harris W.H.
        Cementless acetabular revision with the Harris-Galante porous prosthesis. Results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2004; 86-A: 1007-1011
        • Hansen E.
        • Shearer D.
        • Ries M.D.
        Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects?.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011; 469: 494-502
        • Hsu J.T.
        • Lai K.A.
        • Chen Q.
        • Zobitz M.E.
        • Huang H.L.
        • An K.N.
        • Chang C.H.
        The relation between micromotion and screw fixation in acetabular cup.
        Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 2006; 84: 34-41
        • Hsu J.T.
        • Chang C.H.
        • Huang H.L.
        • Zobitz M.E.
        • Chen W.P.
        • Lai K.A.
        • An K.N.
        The number of screws, bone quality, and friction coefficient affect acetabular cup stability.
        Med. Eng. Phys. 2007; 29: 1089-1095
        • Iorio R.
        • Puskas B.
        • Healy W.L.
        • Tilzey J.F.
        • Specht L.M.
        • Thompson M.S.
        Cementless acetabular fixation with and without screws: analysis of stability and migration.
        J. Arthroplast. 2010; 25: 309-313
        • Laflamme G.Y.
        • Alami G.B.
        • Zhim F.
        Cement as a locking mechanism for screw heads in acetabular revision shells - a biomechanical analysis.
        Hip Int. 2008; 18: 29-34
        • Liu Q.
        • Zhou Y.X.
        • Xu H.J.
        • Tang J.
        • Guo S.J.
        • Tang Q.H.
        Safe zone for transacetabular screw fixation in prosthetic acetabular reconstruction of high developmental dysplasia of the hip.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009; 91: 2880-2885
        • Maxian T.A.
        • Brown T.D.
        • Pedersen D.R.
        • Callaghan J.J.
        A sliding-distance-coupled finite element formulation for polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty.
        J. Biomech. 1996; 29: 687-692
        • Meneghini R.M.
        • Stultz A.D.
        • Watson J.S.
        • Ziemba-Davis M.
        • Buckley C.A.
        Does ischial screw fixation improve mechanical stability in revision total hip arthroplasty?.
        J. Arthroplast. 2010; 25: 1157-1161
        • Perona P.G.
        • Lawrence J.
        • Paprosky W.G.
        • Patwardhan A.G.
        • Sartori M.
        Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation.
        J. Arthroplast. 1992; 7: 537-547
        • Pilliar R.M.
        • Lee J.M.
        • Maniatopoulos C.
        Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1986; : 108-113
        • Widmer K.H.
        • Zurfluh B.
        • Morscher E.W.
        Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets.
        J. Arthroplast. 2002; 17: 926-935
        • Won C.H.
        • Hearn T.C.
        • Tile M.
        Micromotion of cementless hemispherical acetabular components. Does press-fit need adjunctive screw fixation?.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br.). 1995; 77: 484-489