Advertisement

Differences in lumbar spine and lower extremity kinematics during a step down functional task in people with and people without low back pain

      Highlights

      • Low back pain group displays less sagittal lumbar movement during a step down task.
      • Low back pain group displays more frontal and axial plane movement at the knee joint.
      • Important to examine low back and lower extremity movement during functional tasks in people with low back pain.
      • Differences in functional movements among movement-based low back pain subgroups should be examined further.

      Abstract

      Background

      When functional movements are impaired in people with low back pain, they may be a contributing factor to chronicity and recurrence. The purpose of the current study was to examine lumbar spine, pelvis, and lower extremity kinematics during a step down functional task between people with and without a history of low back pain.

      Methods

      A 3-dimensional motion capture system was used to analyze kinematics during a step down task. Total excursion of the lumbar spine, pelvis, and lower extremity segments in each plane were calculated from the start to end of the task. Separate analysis of variance tests (α = 0.05) were conducted to determine the effect of independent variables of group and plane on lumbar spine, pelvis, and lower extremity kinematics. An exploratory analysis was conducted to examine kinematic differences among movement-based low back pain subgroups.

      Findings

      Subjects with low back pain displayed less lumbar spine movement than controls across all three planes of movement (P-values = 0.001–0.043). This group difference was most pronounced in the sagittal plane. For the lower extremity, subjects with low back pain displayed more frontal and axial plane knee movement than controls (P-values = 0.001). There were no significant differences in kinematics among movement-based low back pain subgroups.

      Interpretation

      People with low back pain displayed less lumbar region movement in the sagittal plane and more off-plane knee movements than the control group during a step down task. Clinicians can use this information when assessing lumbar spine and lower extremity movement during functional tasks, with the goal of developing movement-based interventions.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Andersson G.B.
        Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain.
        Lancet. 1999; 354: 581-585
        • Atlas S.J.
        • Nardin R.A.
        Evaluation and treatment of low back pain: an evidence-based approach to clinical care.
        Muscle Nerve. 2003; 27: 265-284
        • Black K.M.
        • Mcclure P.
        • Polansky M.
        The influence of different sitting positions on cervical and lumbar posture.
        Spine. 1996; 21: 65-70
        • Chesworth B.M.
        • Padfield B.J.
        • Helewa A.
        • Stitt L.W.
        A comparison of hip mobility in patients with low back pain and matched healthy subjects.
        Physiother. Can. 1994; 46: 267-274
        • Childs J.D.
        • Piva S.R.
        • Fritz J.M.
        Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.
        Spine. 2005; 30: 1331-1334
        • Dankaerts W.
        • O'sullivan P.
        • Burnett A.
        • Straker L.
        Differences in sitting postures are associated with nonspecific chronic low back pain disorders when patients are subclassified.
        Spine. 2006; 31: 698-704
        • Fairbank J.C.T.
        • Pynsent P.B.
        The Oswestry disability index.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 2940-2952
        • Fritz J.M.
        • Irrgang J.J.
        A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the Quebec back pain disability scale.
        Phys. Ther. 2001; 81: 776-788
        • Gombatto S.P.
        • Collins D.R.
        • Sahrmann S.A.
        • Engsberg J.R.
        • Van Dillen L.R.
        Patterns of lumbar region movement during trunk lateral bending in 2 subgroups of people with low back pain.
        Phys. Ther. 2007; 87: 441-454
        • Gombatto S.P.
        • Kroll M.E.
        • Mccallum K.E.
        • Shiffer M.N.
        Relationship between lumbar region kinematics during a clinical test and a functional activity in people with and without low back pain - a pilot study.
        in: Biennial Meeting of the Canadian Society of Biomechanics. 2010 (Kingston, ON)
        • Gombatto S.
        • Ellis M.
        • Joyce C.
        • Linske G.
        • Muehlenkamp P.
        Validity and reliability of a multi-segmental lumbar spine model using a 3D motion analysis system.
        in: American Physical Therapy Association. San Diego, CA, Combined Sections Meeting2013
        • Gombatto S.P.
        • Brock T.
        • Delork A.
        • Jones G.
        • Madden E.
        • Rinere C.
        Lumbar spine kinematics during walking in people with and people without low back pain.
        Gait Posture. 2015;
        • Gombatto S.P.
        • Brock T.
        • Delork A.
        • Jones G.
        • Madden E.
        • Rinere C.
        Lumbar spine kinematics during walking in people with and people without low back pain.
        Gait Posture. 2015; 42: 539-544
        • Gore M.
        • Sadosky A.
        • Stacey B.R.
        • Tai K.S.
        • Leslie D.
        The burden of chronic low back pain: clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37: E668-E677
        • Harris Hayes M.
        • Sahrmann S.A.
        • Van Dillen L.R.
        Classification, treatment, and outcomes of a patient with lumbar extension syndrome.
        Physiother. Theory Pract. 2005; 21: 181-196
        • Harris-Hayes M.
        • Van Dillen L.R.
        The inter-tester reliability of physical therapists classifying low back pain problems based on the movement system impairment classification system.
        Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2009; 1: 117-126
        • Harris-Hayes M.
        • Sahrmann S.A.
        • Van Dillen L.R.
        Relationship between the hip and low back pain in athletes who participate in rotation-related sports.
        J. Sport Rehabil. 2009; 18: 60-75
        • Hart L.G.
        • Deyo R.A.
        • Cherkin D.C.
        Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 11-19
        • Karayannis N.V.
        • Jull G.A.
        • Hodges P.W.
        Physiotherapy movement based classification approaches to low back pain: comparison of subgroups through review and developer/expert survey.
        BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2012; 13: 24
        • Lee J.K.
        • Desmoulin G.T.
        • Khan A.H.
        • Park E.J.
        Comparison of 3D spinal motions during stair-climbing between individuals with and without low back pain.
        Gait Posture. 2011; 34: 222-226
        • Leung F.T.
        • Mendis M.D.
        • Stanton W.R.
        • Hides J.A.
        The relationship between the piriformis muscle, low back pain, lower limb injuries and motor control training among elite football players.
        J. Sci. Med. Sport. 2015; 18: 407-411
        • Maluf K.S.
        • Sahrmann S.A.
        • Van Dillen L.R.
        Use of a classification system to guide nonsurgical management of a patient with chronic low back pain.
        Phys. Ther. 2000; 80: 1097-1111
        • Mazzone B.
        • Wood R.
        • Gombatto S.
        Spine kinematics during prone extension in people with and without low back pain and among classification-specific low back pain subgroups.
        J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2016; : 1-33
        • Mitchell T.
        • O'sullivan P.B.
        • Burnett A.F.
        • Straker L.
        • Smith A.
        Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain.
        BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2008; 9: 1-11
        • Murray E.
        • Birley E.
        • Twycross-Lewis R.
        • Morrissey D.
        The relationship between hip rotation range of movement and low back pain prevalence in amateur golfers: an observational study.
        Phys. Ther. Sport. 2009; 10: 131-135
        • O'sullivan P.
        Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism.
        Man. Ther. 2005; 10: 242-255
        • O'sullivan K.
        • O'sullivan L.
        • Campbell A.
        • O'sullivan P.
        • Dankaerts W.
        Towards monitoring lumbo-pelvic posture in real-life situations: concurrent validity of a novel posture monitor and a traditional laboratory-based motion analysis system.
        Man. Ther. 2012; 17: 77-83
        • Pai S.
        • Sundaram L.J.
        Low back pain: an economic assessment in the United States.
        Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2004; 35: 1-5
        • Piazza S.J.
        • Okita N.
        • Cavanagh P.R.
        Accuracy of the functional method of hip joint center location: effects of limited motion and varied implementation.
        J. Biomech. 2001; 34: 967-973
        • Sahrmann S.A.
        Movement impairment syndromes of the lumbar spine.
        in: Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes. Mosby, Inc., St. Louis, MO2002
        • Scannell J.P.
        • Mcgill S.M.
        Lumbar posture–should it, and can it, be modified? A study of passive tissue stiffness and lumbar position during activities of daily living.
        Phys. Ther. 2003; 83: 907-917
        • Seay J.F.
        • Van Emmerik R.E.
        • Hamill J.
        Low back pain status affects pelvis-trunk coordination and variability during walking and running.
        Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 2011; 26: 572-578
        • Shum G.L.
        • Crosbie J.
        • Lee R.Y.
        Effect of low back pain on the kinematics and joint coordination of the lumbar spine and hip during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit.
        Spine. 2005; 30: 1998-2004
        • Shum G.L.
        • Crosbie J.
        • Lee R.Y.
        Symptomatic and asymptomatic movement coordination of the lumbar spine and hip during an everyday activity.
        Spine. 2005; 30: E697-E702
        • Shum G.L.
        • Crosbie J.
        • Lee R.Y.
        Movement coordination of the lumbar spine and hip during a picking up activity in low back pain subjects.
        Eur. Spine J. 2007; 16: 749-758
        • Teng H.L.
        • Powers C.M.
        Sagittal plane trunk posture influences patellofemoral joint stress during running.
        J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2014; 44: 785-792
        • Teng H.L.
        • Powers C.M.
        Influence of trunk posture on lower extremity energetics during running.
        Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015; 47: 625-630
        • Vad V.B.
        • Bhat A.L.
        • Basrai D.
        • Gebeh A.
        • Aspergren D.D.
        • Andrews J.R.
        Low back pain in professional golfers: the role of associated hip and low back range-of-motion deficits.
        Am. J. Sports Med. 2004; 32: 494-497
        • Van Dillen L.R.
        • Sahrmann S.A.
        • Norton B.J.
        • Caldwell C.A.
        • Mcdonnell M.K.
        • Bloom N.
        The effect of modifying patient-preferred spinal movement and alignment during symptom testing in patients with low back pain: a preliminary report.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003; 84: 313-322
        • Van Dillen L.R.
        • Sahrmann S.A.
        • Norton B.J.
        • Caldwell C.A.
        • Mcdonnell M.K.
        • Bloom N.J.
        Movement system impairment-based categories for low back pain: stage 1 validation.
        J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2003; 33: 126-142
        • Van Dillen L.R.
        • Sahrmann S.A.
        • Wagner J.M.
        Classification, intervention, and outcomes for a person with lumbar rotation with flexion syndrome.
        Phys. Ther. 2005; 85: 336-351
        • Van Dillen L.R.
        • Gombatto S.P.
        • Collins D.R.
        • Engsberg J.R.
        • Sahrmann S.A.
        Symmetry of timing of hip and lumbopelvic rotation motion in 2 different subgroups of people with low back pain.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2007; 88: 351-360
        • Waddell G.
        • Allan D.B.
        • Newton M.
        Frymoyer J.W. Clinical Evaluation of Disability in Back Pain. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia1991
        • Waddell G.
        • Newton M.
        • Henderson I.
        • Somerville D.
        • Main C.J.
        A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (Fabq) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low-back-pain and disability.
        Pain. 1993; 52: 157-168
        • Zazulak B.T.
        • Hewett T.E.
        • Reeves N.P.
        • Goldberg B.
        • Cholewicki J.
        Deficits in neuromuscular control of the trunk predict knee injury risk: a prospective biomechanical-epidemiologic study.
        Am. J. Sports Med. 2007; 35: 1123-1130