Scapular asymmetry in participants with and without shoulder impingement syndrome; a three-dimensional motion analysis

      Highlights

      • The dynamic scapular kinematics and scapular asymmetry were evaluated.
      • A novel approach was used to quantify scapular asymmetry.
      • Kinematic differences were observed between healthy controls and participants with impingement.
      • The scapular movement was more asymmetrical in participants with impingement.

      Abstract

      Background

      This study analyzed the dynamic three-dimensional scapular kinematics and scapular asymmetry in participants with and without shoulder impingement syndrome.

      Methods

      Twenty-nine participants with shoulder impingement syndrome, have been suffering from unilateral shoulder pain at the dominant arm lasting more than six weeks and thirty-seven healthy controls participated in the study. Scapular kinematics was measured with an electromagnetic tracking device during shoulder elevation in the sagittal plane. Data for bilateral scapular orientation were analyzed at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of humerothoracic elevation and lowering. The symmetry angle was calculated to quantify scapular asymmetry throughout shoulder elevation.

      Findings

      Statistical comparisons indicated that the scapula was more downwardly rotated (p < 0.001) and anteriorly tilted (p = 0.005) in participants with shoulder impingement syndrome compared to healthy controls. Side-to-side comparisons revealed that the scapula was more anteriorly tilted on the involved side of participants with shoulder impingement syndrome (p = 0.01), and the scapula was rotated more internally (p = 0.02) and downwardly (p = 0.01) on the dominant side of healthy controls. Although there were side-to-side differences in both groups, symmetry angle calculation revealed that the scapular movement was more asymmetrical for scapular internal and upward rotation in individuals with shoulder impingement syndrome when compared with healthy controls (p < 0.05).

      Interpretation

      The findings of the study increase our knowledge and understanding of scapular alterations in symptomatic and asymptomatic populations, which creates biomechanical considerations for shoulder assessment and rehabilitation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Borsa P.A.
        • Laudner K.G.
        • Sauers E.L.
        Mobility and stability adaptations in the shoulder of the overhead athlete: a theoretical and evidence-based perspective.
        Sports Med. 2008; 38: 17-36
        • Cohen R.B.
        • Williams Jr., G.R.
        Impingement syndrome and rotator cuff disease as repetitive motion disorders.
        Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 1998; 351: 95-101
        • Endo K.
        • Ikata T.
        • Katoh S.
        • Takeda Y.
        Radiographic assessment of scapular rotational tilt in chronic shoulder impingement syndrome.
        J. Orthop. Sci. 2001; 6: 3-10
        • Endo K.
        • Yukata K.
        • Yasui N.
        Influence of age on scapulo-thoracic orientation.
        Clin. Biomech. 2004; 19 (Bristol, Avon): 1009-1013
        • Falla D.
        • Jull G.
        • Hodges P.
        Feedforward activity of the cervical flexor muscles during voluntary arm movements is delayed in chronic neck pain.
        Exp. Brain Res. 2004; 157: 43-48
        • Gundersen L.A.
        • Valle D.R.
        • Barr A.E.
        • Danoff J.V.
        • Stanhope S.J.
        • Snyder-Mackler L.
        Bilateral analysis of the knee and ankle during gait: an examination of the relationship between lateral dominance and symmetry.
        Phys. Ther. 1989; 69: 640-650
        • Haik M.N.
        • Alburquerque-Sendín F.
        • Camargo P.R.
        Reliability and minimal detectable change of 3-dimensional scapular orientation in individuals with and without shoulder impingement.
        J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2014; 44: 341-349
        • Hawkins R.J.
        • Kennedy J.C.
        Impingement syndrome in athletes.
        Am. J. Sports Med. 1980; 8: 151-158
        • Hebert L.J.
        • Moffet H.
        • McFadyen B.J.
        • Dionne C.E.
        Scapular behavior in shoulder impingement syndrome.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2002; 83: 60-69
        • Herzog W.
        • Nigg B.M.
        • Read L.J.
        • Olsson E.
        Asymmetries in ground reaction force patterns in normal human gait.
        Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1989; 21: 110-114
        • Hodges P.W.
        • Richardson C.A.
        Altered trunk muscle recruitment in people with low back pain with upper limb movement at different speeds.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1005-1012
        • Inman V.T.
        • Saunders J.B.
        • Abbott L.C.
        Observations of the function of the shoulder joint. 1944.
        Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 1996; : 3-12
        • Karduna A.R.
        • McClure P.W.
        • Michener L.A.
        • Sennett B.
        Dynamic measurements of three-dimensional scapular kinematics: a validation study.
        J. Biomech. Eng. 2001; 123: 184-190
        • Kibler W.B.
        The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function.
        Am. J. Sports Med. 1998; 26: 325-337
        • Lee S.K.
        • Yang D.S.
        • Kim H.Y.
        • Choy W.S.
        A comparison of 3D scapular kinematics between dominant and nondominant shoulders during multiplanar arm motion.
        Indian J. Orthop. 2013; 47: 135
        • Ludewig P.M.
        • Cook T.M.
        Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement.
        Phys. Ther. 2000; 80: 276-291
        • Ludewig P.M.
        • Reynolds J.F.
        The association of scapular kinematics and glenohumeral joint pathologies.
        J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2009; 39: 90-104
        • Lukasiewicz A.C.
        • McClure P.
        • Michener L.
        • Pratt N.
        • Sennett B.
        Comparison of 3-dimensional scapular position and orientation between subjects with and without shoulder impingement.
        J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1999; 29: 574-583
        • Magee D.
        Orthopaedic Physical Assessment.
        W.B. Saunders Co, Philedelphia1997
        • Matsuki K.
        • Matsuki K.O.
        • Mu S.
        • Yamaguchi S.
        • Ochiai N.
        • Sasho T.
        • Sugaya H.
        • Toyone T.
        • Wada Y.
        • Takahashi K.
        • Banks S.A.
        In vivo 3-dimensional analysis of scapular kinematics: comparison of dominant and nondominant shoulders.
        J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2011; 20: 659-665
        • Matsuki K.
        • Matsuki K.O.
        • Yamaguchi S.
        • Ochiai N.
        • Sasho T.
        • Sugaya H.
        • Toyone T.
        • Wada Y.
        • Takahashi K.
        • Banks S.A.
        Dynamic in vivo glenohumeral kinematics during scapular plane abduction in healthy shoulders.
        J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2012; 42: 96-104
        • McClure P.W.
        • Michener L.A.
        • Karduna A.R.
        Shoulder function and 3-dimensional scapular kinematics in people with and without shoulder impingement syndrome.
        Phys. Ther. 2006; 86: 1075-1090
        • Meskers C.G.
        • van der Helm F.C.
        • Rozendaal L.A.
        • Rozing P.M.
        In vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation center from scapular bony landmarks by linear regression.
        J. Biomech. 1998; 31: 93-96
        • Neer C.S.
        Impingement lesions.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1983; 173: 70-77
        • Oyama S.
        • Myers J.B.
        • Wassinger C.A.
        • Daniel Ricci R.
        • Lephart S.M.
        Asymmetric resting scapular posture in healthy overhead athletes.
        J. Athl. Train. 2008; 43: 565-570
        • Robinson R.O.
        • Herzog W.
        • Nigg B.M.
        Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry.
        J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 1987; 10: 172-176
        • Struyf F.
        • Nijs J.
        • Baeyens J.P.
        • Mottram S.
        • Meeusen R.
        Scapular positioning and movement in unimpaired shoulders, shoulder impingement syndrome, and glenohumeral instability Scapular positioning and motor control in children and adults: a laboratory study using clinical measures.
        Scan. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2011; 21: 352-358
        • Thigpen C.A.
        • Gross M.T.
        • Karas S.G.
        • Garrett W.E.
        • Yu B.
        The repeatability of scapular rotations across three planes of humeral elevation.
        Res. Sports Med. 2005; 13: 181-198
        • Timmons M.K.
        • Thigpen C.A.
        • Seitz A.L.
        • Karduna A.R.
        • Arnold B.L.
        • Michener L.A.
        Scapular kinematics and subacromial-impingement syndrome: a meta-analysis.
        J. Sport Rehabil. 2012; 21: 354-370
        • Tzannes A.
        • Paxinos A.
        • Callanan M.
        • Murrell G.A.
        An assessment of the interexaminer reliability of tests for shoulder instability.
        J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2004; 13: 18-23
        • Uhl T.L.
        • Kibler W.B.
        • Gecewich B.
        • Tripp B.L.
        Evaluation of clinical assessment methods for scapular dyskinesis.
        Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 1240-1248
        • Wadsworth D.
        • Bullock-Saxton J.
        Recruitment patterns of the scapular rotator muscles in freestyle swimmers with subacromial impingement.
        Int. J. Sports Med. 1997; 18: 618-624
        • Warner J.J.
        • Micheli L.J.
        • Arslanian L.E.
        • Kennedy J.
        • Kennedy R.
        Scapulothoracic motion in normal shoulders and shoulders with glenohumeral instability and impingement syndrome a study using Moire topographic analysis.
        Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 1992; 285: 191-199
        • Wu G.
        • van der Helm F.C.
        • Veeger H.E.
        • Makhsous M.
        • Van Roy P.
        • Anglin C.
        • Nagels J.
        • Karduna A.R.
        • McQuade K.
        • Wang X.
        • Werner F.W.
        • Buchholz B.
        • International Society of B.
        ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.
        J. Biomech. 2005; 38: 981-992
        • Yoshizaki K.
        • Hamada J.
        • Tamai K.
        • Sahara R.
        • Fujiwara T.
        • Fujimoto T.
        Analysis of the scapulohumeral rhythm and electromyography of the shoulder muscles during elevation and lowering: comparison of dominant and nondominant shoulders.
        J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2009; 18: 756-763
        • Zifchock R.A.
        • Davis I.
        • Higginson J.
        • Royer T.
        The symmetry angle: a novel, robust method of quantifying asymmetry.
        Gait Posture. 2008; 27: 622-627