Advertisement

How do elliptical machines differ from walking: A study of torso motion and muscle activity

      Abstract

      Background

      The elliptical trainer is a popular exercise modality, yet its effect on the lumbar spine is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of different hand positions, speed and stride lengths on spine kinematics and corresponding muscle activity while using the elliptical trainer, and compare with those demonstrated in normal walking.

      Methods

      Electromyographic data was collected over 16 trunk and gluteal muscle sites on 40 healthy males (mean age (SD)=23(3)) while on the elliptical trainer. Two stride lengths (46, 66 cm), 2 speeds (self-selected, 30% faster), and 3 hand positions (freehand, central bar, handles) were analyzed. Lumbar spine kinematics was calculated from data collected using a motion capture system. Results were compared to those found in walking using repeated measures ANOVA for each dependent variable with Bonferroni adjustments (P<0.004. Correlations were made between lumbar motion and various anthropometric measures.

      Findings

      All significance levels comparing walking to elliptical varied according to stride length, speed and hand position. Average lumbar flexion angles and lumbar rotation were generally greater on the elliptical trainer, whereas walking produced more frontal motion. Total lumbar flexion/extension was similar between the two activities. Muscle activation patterns of the gluteal muscles were consistently higher on the elliptical, whereas the back extensors, latissimi and internal obliques were greater in only selected conditions.

      Interpretation

      The various hand positions, speeds and stride lengths affect lumbar motion and muscle activity on the elliptical trainer, thus must be considered when incorporated into an exercise protocol.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Adams M.A.
        • Hutton W.C.
        The effect of posture on the role of the apophyseal joints in resisting intervertebral compressive forces.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1980; 62B: 358-362
        • Adams M.A.
        • Hutton W.C.
        The relevance of torsion to the mechanical derangement of the lumbar spine.
        Spine. 1981; 6: 241-248
        • Aultman C.D.
        • Scannell J.
        • McGill S.M.
        The direction of progressive herniation in porcine spine motion segments is influenced by the orientation of the bending axis.
        Clin. Biomech. 2005; 20: 126-129
        • Bolgla L.A.
        • Uhl T.L.
        Electromyographic analysis of hip rehabilitation exercises in a group of healthy subjects.
        J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2005; 35: 487-494
        • Brereton L.C.
        • McGill S.M.
        Frequency response of spine extensors during rapid isometric contractions: effects of muscle length and tension.
        J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 1998; 8: 227-232
        • Burnfield J.M.
        • Shu Y.
        • Buster T.
        • Taylor A.
        Similarity of joint kinematics and muscle demands between elliptical training and walking: implications for practice.
        Phys. Ther. 2010; 90: 1-17
        • Callaghan J.P.
        • McGill S.M.
        Intervertebral disc herniation: studies on a porcine model exposed to highly repetitive flexion/extension motion with compressive force.
        Clin. Biomech. 2001; 16: 28-37
        • Callaghan J.P.
        • Patla A.E.
        • McGill S.
        Low back three-dimensional joint forces, kinematics and kinetics during walking.
        Clin. Biomech. 1999; 14: 203-216
        • Cholewicki J.
        • McGill S.
        • Norman R.W.
        Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: towards development of a hybrid approach.
        J. Biomech. 1995; 28: 321-331
        • Crosbie J.
        • Vachalathiti R.
        • Smith R.
        Age, gender and speed effects on spinal kinematics during walking.
        Gait Posture. 1997; 5: 13-20
        • Drake J.D.
        • Callaghan J.P.
        Intervertebral neural foramina deformation due to two types of repetitive combined loading.
        Clin. Biomech. 2009; 24: 1-6
        • Drake J.D.
        • Aultman C.D.
        • McGill S.M.
        • Callaghan J.P.
        The influence of static axial torque in combined loading on intervertebral joint failure mechanics using a porcine model.
        Clin. Biomech. 2005; 20: 1038-1045
        • Franz J.R.
        • Paylo K.W.
        • Dicharry J.
        • Riley P.O.
        • Kerrigan D.C.
        Changes in the coordination of hip and pelvis kinematics with mode of locomotion.
        Gait Posture. 2009; 29: 494-498
        • Gordon S.J.
        • Yang K.H.
        • Mayer P.J.
        • Mace Jr., A.H.
        • Kish V.L.
        • Radin E.L.
        Mechanism of disc rupture. A preliminary report.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991; 16: 450-456
        • Granata K.P.
        • Marras W.S.
        An EMG assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions.
        J. Biomech. 1993; 26: 1429-1438
        • Granata K.P.
        • W.S. M.
        Cost–benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability.
        Spine. 2000; 25
        • Gunning J.L.
        • Callaghan J.P.
        • McGill S.M.
        Spinal posture and prior loading history modulate compressive strength and type of failure in the spine: a biomechanical study using a porcine cervical spine model.
        Clin. Biomech. 2001; 16: 471-480
        • Leteneur S.
        • Gillet C.
        • Sadeghi H.
        • Allard P.
        • Barbier F.
        Effect of trunk inclination on lower limb joint and lumbar moments in able men during the stance phase of gait.
        Clin. Biomech. 2009; 24: 190-195
        • Lu D.
        • Le P.
        • Davidson B.
        • Zhou B.H.
        • Lu Y.
        • Patel V.
        • et al.
        Frequency of cyclic lumbar loading is a risk factor for cumulative trauma disorder.
        Muscle Nerve. 2008; 38: 867-874
        • Marshall L.W.
        • McGill S.M.
        The role of axial torque in disc herniation.
        Clin. Biomech. 2010; 25: 6-9
        • McGill S.M.
        Low Back Disorders.
        Human Kinetics, Champaign2002
        • Mier C.M.
        • Feito Y.
        Metabolic cost of stride rate, resistance, and combined use of arms and legs on the elliptical trainer.
        Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 2006; 77: 507-513
        • Moreside J.M.
        The effect of limited hip mobility on the lumbar spine in a young adult population.
        PhD dissertation, University of Waterloo, Canada2010
        • Moreside J.M.
        • McGill S.M.
        Quantifying normal 3D hip ROM in healthy young adult males with clinical and laboratory tools: hip mobility restrictions appear to be plane-specific.
        Clin. Biomech. 2011; 26: 824-829
        • Moreside J.M.
        • Vera-Garcia F.J.
        • McGill S.M.
        Trunk muscle activation patterns, lumbar compressive forces, and spine stability when using the Bodyblade.
        Phys. Ther. 2007; 87: 153-163
        • Nachemson A.L.
        • Morris J.M.
        In vivo measurements of intradiscal pressure.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1964; 46A: 1077-1092
        • Punnett L.
        • Fine L.J.
        • Keyserling W.M.
        • Herrin G.D.
        • Chaffin D.B.
        Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers.
        Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 1991; 17: 337-346
        • Schache A.G.
        • Blanch P.D.
        • Rath D.A.
        • Wrigley T.
        • Bennell K.L.
        Differences between the sexes in the three-dimensional angular rotations of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex during treadmill running.
        J. Sports Sci. 2003; 21: 105-118
        • Vera-Garcia F.J.
        • Brown S.H.
        • Gray J.R.
        • McGill S.M.
        Effects of different levels of torso coactivation on trunk muscular and kinematic responses to posteriorly applied sudden loads.
        Clin. Biomech. 2006; 21: 443-455
        • Vera-Garcia F.J.
        • Moreside J.M.
        • McGill S.M.
        MVC techniques to normalize trunk muscle EMG in healthy women.
        J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2010; 20: 10-16