Advertisement

Reality about migration of the nucleus pulposus within the intervertebral disc with changing postures

      Abstract

      Background

      Previous studies reported that, in non-degenerate discs, the nucleus pulposus migrates posteriorly during flexion and anteriorly during extension within the intervertebral disc. However, in these studies the differences between anterior and posterior distances have been regarded as an indicator of nucleus pulposus migration. This study investigated the reality of migration of the nucleus pulposus within the intervertebral disc with changing postures.

      Method

      Magnetic resonance images were obtained of the lumbar spines of 25 asymptomatic volunteers in sitting, standing and supine postures. The anterior and posterior height of the intervertebral disc, the anterior -posterior length of the intervertebral disc and nucleus pulposus, and the positions of the anterior and posterior margins of the nucleus were measured from mid-line sagittal images.

      Findings

      Changing postures altered the anterior and posterior height of the disc and three types of morphological changes, including changes in the anterior -posterior lengths of the intervertebral disc and nucleus pulposus, together with the position of the nucleus in the disc were found. The length of the intervertebral disc and nucleus pulposus changed under the variations in spinal loading caused by posture.

      Interpretation

      The results of this study indicated that the apparent nucleus pulposus migration within intervertebral disc is actually deformation of the nucleus pulposus length which depends on posture and the magnitude of the load. In other words, adopting different postures deforms the nucleus pulposus and therefore, changes the position of the nucleus pulposus but there is no apparent nucleus pulposus migration within the intervertebral disc.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alexander L.A.
        • Hancock E.
        • Agouris I.
        • Smith F.W.
        • MacSween A.
        The response of the nucleus pulposus of the lumbar intervertebral discs to functionally loaded positions.
        Spine. 2007; 32: 1508-1512
        • Andersson G.B.
        • Schultz A.B.
        Effects of fluid injection on mechanical properties of intervertebral discs.
        J. Biomech. 1979; 12: 453-458
        • Bashir W.
        • Hirasawa Y.
        • Smith F.W.
        • Pope M.H.
        Diurnal variation in intervertebral disc height in normal individuals using stand-up positional MRI.
        Eur. Spine J. 2003; 12: 51-52
        • Beattie P.F.
        • Brooks W.M.
        • Rothstein J.M.
        • Sibbitt Jr., W.L.
        • Robergs.
        • MacLean R.A.
        • et al.
        Effect of lordosis on the position of the nucleus pulposus in supine subjects. A study using magnetic resonance imaging.
        Spine. 1994; 19: 2096-2102
        • Biyani A.
        • Andersson G.B.J.
        Low back pain: pathophysiology and management.
        J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2004; 12: 106-115
        • Dabbs V.M.
        • Dabbs L.G.
        Correlation between disc height narrowing and low-back pain.
        Spine. 1990; 15: 1366-1368
        • Fennell A.J.
        • Jones A.P.
        • Hukins D.W.
        Migration of the nucleus pulposus within the intervertebral disc during flexion and extension of the spine.
        Spine. 1996; 21: 2753-2757
        • Fredericson M.
        • Lee S.U.
        • Welsh J.
        • Butts K.
        • Norbash A.
        • Carragee E.J.
        Changes in posterior disc bulging and intervertebral foraminal size associated with flexion–extension movement: a comparison between L4–5 and L5–S1 levels in normal subjects.
        Spine. 2001; 1: 10-17
        • Hammer M.
        Discogenic pain.
        J. Turk. Soc. Algology. 2002; 14: 7-16
        • Harvey S.B.
        • Smith F.W.
        • Hukins D.W.L.
        Measurement of lumbar spine flexion–extension using a low-field open-magnet magnetic resonance scanner.
        Invest. Radiol. 1998; 33: 439-443
        • Hurri H.
        • Karppinen J.
        Discogenic pain.
        Pain. 2004; 112: 225-228
        • Kanayama M.
        • Abumi K.
        • Kaneda K.
        • Tadano S.
        • Ukai T.
        Phase lag of the intersegmental motion in flexion–extension of the lumbar spine: an in vivo study.
        Spine. 1996; 21: 1416-1422
        • Knop-Jergas B.M.
        • Zucherman J.E.
        • Hsu K.Y.
        • DeLong B.
        Anatomic position of a herniated nucleus pulposus predicts the outcome of lumbar discectomy.
        J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 1996; 9: 246-250
        • Krag M.H.
        • Seroussi R.E.
        • Wilder D.G.
        • Pope M.H.
        Internal displacement distribution from in vitro loading of human thoracic and lumbar spinal motion segments: experimental results and theoretical predictions.
        Spine. 1987; 12: 1001-1007
        • Kuslich S.D.
        • Ulstrom C.L.
        • Michael C.J.
        The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia.
        Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1991; 22: 181-187
        • Lyndsay A.A.
        • Hancock E.
        • Agouris I.
        • Smith W.F.
        • MacSween A.
        The Response of the Nucleus Pulposus of the Lumbar Intervertebral Discs to Functionally Loaded Positions.
        Spine. 2007; 15: 1508-1512
        • McKenzie R.Z.
        The Lumbar Spine: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy.
        Spinal Publications, Waikanae, New Zealand1989
        • Norcross J.P.
        • Lester G.E.
        • Weinhold P.
        • Dahners L.E.
        An in vivo model of degenerative disc disease.
        Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2003; 21: 183-188
        • Milette P.C.
        • Fontaine S.
        • Lepanto L.
        • Cardinal E.
        • Breton G.
        Differentiating lumbar disc protrusions, disc bulges, and discs with normal contour but abnormal signal intensity. Magnetic resonance imaging with discographic correlations.
        Spine. 1999; 24: 44-53
        • Paajanen H.
        • Erkintalo M.
        • Kuusela T.
        • Dahlstrom S.
        • Kormano M.
        Magnetic resonance study of disc degeneration in young low-back pain patients.
        Spine. 1989; 14: 982-985
        • Pfirrmann C.W.A.
        • Metzdorf A.
        • Zanetti M.
        • Hodler J.
        • Boos N.
        Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.
        Spine. 2001; 26: 1873-1878
        • Powell M.C.
        • Wilson M.
        • Szypryt P.
        • Symonds. E.M.
        • Worthington B.S.
        Prevalence of lumbar disc degeneration observed by magnetic resonance in symptomless women.
        Lancet. 1986; : 1366-1367
        • Schmid G.
        • Witteler A.
        • Willburger R.
        • Kuhnen C.
        • Jergas M.
        • Koester O.
        Lumbar disk herniation: correlation of histologic findings with marrow signal intensity changes in vertebral endplates at MR imaging.
        Radiology. 2004; 231: 352-358
        • Schnebel B.E.
        • Simmons J.W.
        • Chowning J.
        • Davidson R.
        A digitizing technique for the study of movement of intradiscal dye in response to flexion and extension of the lumbar spine.
        Spine. 1988; 13: 309-312
        • Schwarzer A.C.
        • Aprill C.N.
        • Derby R.
        • Fortin J.D.
        • Kine G.
        • Bogduk N.
        The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic low back pain.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 1878-1883
        • Sehgal N.
        • Fortin J.D.
        Internal disc disruption and low back pain.
        Pain Physician. 2000; 3: 143-157
        • Seroussi R.E.
        • Krag M.H.
        • Muller D.L.
        • Pope M.H.
        Internal deformations of intact and denucleated human lumbar discs subjected to compression, flexion, and extension loads.
        J. Orthop. Res. 1989; 7: 122-131
        • Shea K.
        • Stevens P.
        • Nelson M.
        • Smith J.T.
        • Masters K.S.
        • Yandow S.
        A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement: intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles.
        Spine. 1998; 23: 551-555
        • Shepperd J.A.N.
        The inside world of the disc.
        in: Shepperd J.A.N. Proceeding of the society for Back Pain Research. Conquest Hospital, St Leonards-on-Sea, England1991: 37-38
        • Shepperd J.A.N.
        • Rand C.
        Internal disc dynamics.
        Conquest Hospital, St Leonards-on-Sea, England1992 (Privately circulated video recording)
        • Smith F.W.
        • Pope M.H.
        Imaging corner.
        Spine. 2003; 27: 2521-2522
        • Taylor J.R.
        • Giles L.G.F.
        Lumbar intervertebral discs.
        in: Giles L.G.F. Singer K.P. Clinical anatomy and management of low back pain. Butter worth-Heinemann, Oxford1997: 49-71
        • Tertti M.
        • Paajanen H.
        • Laato M.
        • Aho H.
        • Komu M.
        • Kormano M.
        Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines.
        Spine. 1991; 16: 629-634
        • Wetzel F.T.
        • Donaldson R.
        The role of repeated end-range/pain response assessment in the management of symptomatic lumbar discs.
        Spine. 2003; 3: 146-154
        • White A.A.
        • Panjabi M.M.
        Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine.
        2nd ed. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia1990
        • Wisneski R.J.
        • Garfin S.R.
        • Rothman R.H.
        • Lutz G.E.
        Lumbar disc disease.
        in: Herkowitz H.N. Garfin S.R. Balderston R.A. WB Saunders, Philadelphia1999: 613-679