Research Article| Volume 22, ISSUE 9, P980-987, November 2007

MRI-based registration of pelvic alignment affected by altered pelvic floor muscle characteristics



      Pelvic floor muscles have potential to influence relative pelvic alignment. Side asymmetry in pelvic floor muscle tension is claimed to induce pelvic malalignment. However, its nature and amplitude are not clear. There is a need for non-invasive and reliable assessment method. An intervention experiment of unilateral pelvic floor muscle activation on healthy females was performed using image data for intra-subject comparison of normal and altered configuration of bony pelvis.


      Sequent magnetic resonance imaging of 14 females in supine position was performed with 1.5 T static body coil in coronal orientation. The intervention, surface functional electrostimulation, was applied to activate pelvic floor muscles on the right side. Spatial coordinates of 23 pelvic landmarks were localized in each subject and registered by specially designed magnetic resonance image data processing tool (MPT2006), where individual error calculation; data registration, analysis and 3D visualization were interfaced.


      The effect of intervention was large (Cohen’s d = 1.34). We found significant differences in quantity (P < 0.01) and quality (P = 0.02) of normal and induced pelvic displacements. After pelvic floor muscle activation on the right side, pelvic structures shifted most frequently to the right side in ventro-caudal direction. The right femoral head, the right innominate and the coccyx showed the largest displacements.


      The consequences arising from the capacity of pelvic floor muscles to displace pelvic bony structures are important to consider not only in management of malalignment syndrome but also in treatment of incontinence. The study has demonstrated benefits associated with processing of magnetic resonance image data within pelvic region with high localization and registration reliability.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Al-Eisa E.
        • Egan D.
        • Deluzio K.
        • Wassersug R.
        Effects of pelvic skeletal asymmetry on trunk movement: three-dimensional analysis in healthy individuals versus patients with mechanical low back pain.
        Spine. 2006; 31: E71-E79
      1. Bendová, P., Špringrová, I., Tichý, M., 2004. Dysfunction of pelvic floor muscles and its influence on postural control – pilot study. In: Proceedings of European Federation for Research in Rehabilitation Congress, Ljubljana, pp. 197–200.

        • Bertschinger K.M.
        • Hetzer F.H.
        • Roos J.E.
        • Treiber K.
        • Marincek B.
        • Hilfiker P.R.
        Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit.
        Radiology. 2002; 223: 501-508
        • Bø K.
        • Finckenhagen H.B.
        Is there any difference in measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength in supine and standing position?.
        Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2003; 82: 1120-1124
        • Bø K.
        • Sherburn M.
        Evaluation of female pelvic floor muscle function and strength.
        Phys. Ther. 2005; 85: 269-282
        • Bø K.
        • Lilleas F.
        • Talseth T.
        • Hedland H.
        Dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor muscles in an upright sitting position.
        Neurourol. Urodyn. 2001; 20: 167-174
        • Bussey M.D.
        • Yanai T.
        • Milburn P.
        A non-invasive technique for assessing innominate bone motion.
        Clin. Biomech. 2004; 19: 85-90
        • Buyruk H.M.
        • Stam H.J.
        • Snijders C.J.
        • Vleeming A.
        • Lameris J.S.
        • Holland W.P.
        The use of colour Doppler imaging for the assessment of sacroiliac joint stiffness: a study on embalmed human pelvises, a study on healthy subjects.
        Eur. J. Radiol. 1995; 21: 112-121
        • Fielding J.R.
        • Versi E.
        • Mulkern R.V.
        • Lerner M.H.
        • Griffiths D.A.
        • Jolesz F.A.
        MR imaging of the female pelvic floor in the supine and upright positions.
        J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 1996; 6: 961-963
        • Fitzpatrick J.M.
        • West J.B.
        • Maurer C.R.
        Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration.
        IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 1998; 17: 694-702
        • Fitzpatrick J.M.
        • Hill D.L.
        • Maurer C.R.
        Image registration.
        in: Sonka M. Fitzpatrick J.M. Handbook of Medical Imaging. Medical Image Processing and Analysis. vol. 2. SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, USA2000 (Chapter 8)
        • Frawley H.C.
        • Galea M.P.
        • Phillips B.A.
        • Sherburn M.
        • Bø K.
        Effect of test position on pelvic floor muscle assessment.
        Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006; 17: 365-371
        • Greenman P.E.
        Innominate shear dysfunction.
        J. Manual Med. 1986; 2: 93-95
        • Gutman R.E.
        • Pannu H.K.
        • Cundiff G.W.
        • Melick C.F.
        • Siddique S.A.
        • Handa V.L.
        Anatomic relationship between the vaginal apex and the bony architecture of the pelvis: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 192: 1544-1548
        • Handa V.
        • Pannu H.K.
        • Siddique S.
        Architectural differences in the bony pelvis of woman with and without pelvic floor disorders.
        J. Obst. Gyn. 2003; 102: 1283-1290
        • Hoyte L.
        • Thomas J.
        • Foster R.T.
        • Shott S.
        • Jakab M.
        Racial differences in pelvic morphology among asymptomatic nulliparous women as seen on three-dimensional magnetic resonance images.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 193: 2035-2040
        • Hungerford B.
        • Gilleard W.
        • Lee D.
        Altered patterns of pelvic bone motion determined in subjects with posterior pelvic pain using skin markers.
        Clin. Biomech. 2004; 19: 456-464
        • Kodešová K.
        • Špringrová I.
        • Tichý M.
        • Bendová P.
        Electrostimulation of musculus coccygeus and parameter observation by sonography.
        EuroRehab. 2005; 3–4: 77-81
        • Lalonde N.M.
        • Dansereau J.
        • Pauget P.
        • Cinquin P.
        • Aissaoui R.
        Accessing the influence of repositioning on the pelvis’ 3-D orientatio n in wheelchair users.
        IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2006; 14: 76-82
      2. Lee, D.G., Lee, L.J., 2004. Stress urinary incontinence – a consequence of failed load transfer through the pelvic girdle? In: Proceedings of the 5th Interdisciplinary World Congress on Low Back and Pelvic Pain, Melbourne.

        • Malbohan I.
        • Mojžı´šová L.
        • Tichý J.
        The role of coccygeal spasm in low back pain.
        J. Manual. Med. 1989; 4: 140-141
        • O’Sullivan P.
        • Beales D.
        • Beetham J.
        • Cripps J.
        • Graf F.
        • Lin I.
        • Tucker B.
        • Avery A.
        Altered motor control strategies in subjects with sacroiliac joint pain during the active straight leg raise test.
        Spine. 2002; 27: E1-E8
        • Pool-Goudzwaard A.
        • van Dijke G.H.
        • van Gurp M.
        • Mulder P.
        • Snijders C.
        • Stoeckart R.
        Contribution of pelvic floor muscles to stiffness of the pelvic ring.
        Clin. Biomech. 2004; 19: 564-571
        • Schamberger W.
        The Malalignment Syndrome.
        Churchill Livingstone, London2002 (p. 29)
        • Snijders C.J.
        • Vleeming A.
        • Stoeckart R.
        Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs. Part 1, 2.
        Clin. Biomech. 1993; 8: 295-301
        • Sturesson B.
        • Uden A.
        • Vleeming A.
        A radiostereometric analysis of the movements of the sacroiliac joints in the reciprocal straddle position.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 214-217
      3. Tichý M., 2003. Fixed nutation of the pelvis results from evoked pelvic floor muscles hypertonus. In: Proceedings of 2nd World Congress of ISPRM, Prague, pp. 757–760.

        • Tichý M.
        • Grim M.
        Morphogenesis of the human gluteus maximus muscle arising from two muscle primordial.
        Anat. Embryol. 1985; 173: 275-277
        • Tichý M.
        • Malbohan I.M.
        • Otáhal M.
        • Chalupová M.
        Pelvic muscles influence the sacroiliac joint.
        J. Orthop. Med. 1999; 21: 3-6
        • van Wingerden J.P.
        • Vleeming A.
        • Buyruk H.M.
        • Raissadat K.
        Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint in vivo: verification of muscular contribution to force closure of the pelvis.
        Eur. Spine J. 2004; 13: 199-205
        • West J.B.
        • Fitzpatrick J.M.
        • Wang M.Y.
        • et al.
        Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques.
        J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1997; 21: 554-566
        • Westbrook C.
        • Kaut Roth C.
        MRI in Practice.
        third ed. Blackwell, Oxford2005 (pp. 10–15, 61)
        • Zheng N.
        • Watson L.G.
        • Yong-Hing K.
        Biomechanical modelling of the human sacroiliac joint.
        Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1997; 35: 77-82