Advertisement

A knowledge-based computer-aided system for closed diaphyseal fracture reduction

  • Terry K.K. Koo
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Address: Department of Research and Basic Science, New York Chiropractic College, 2360 State Route 89, Seneca Falls, NY 13148-3204, USA.
    Affiliations
    Foot Levelers Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Research, New York Chiropractic College, 2360 State Route 89, Seneca Falls, NY 13148-3204, USA

    Department of Basic Science, New York Chiropractic College, 2360 State Route 89, Seneca Falls, NY 13148-3204, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Arthur F.T. Mak
    Affiliations
    Department of Health Technology and Informatics, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Background

      We recently developed an algorithm to perform closed fracture reduction using unilateral external fixator. Although its validity has been verified experimentally, the whole reduction process was not evaluated owing to the lack of a device that could facilitate its implementation in clinical practice. The objective of this study is to develop a prototype of such a system, and quantify its reduction accuracy.

      Methods

      The system consists of a custom-made unilateral external device and a self-contained software package. The device features 7 one degree of freedom joints, each allows for continuous adjustments and is equipped with measurement components to facilitate accurate positioning. A CT-based method was developed, which facilitates virtual reduction and calculates the adjustment requirements that reduce a fracture deformity. The device was adjusted off-the-site and reattached back in place to guide the reduction of the fracture fragments. Reduction accuracy was evaluated using eight phantoms of different types, sides and fracture patterns by calculating the rotation about a screw axis and the displacement between the origins of the distal and proximal local coordinate systems after the reduction.

      Findings

      The mean (SD) of the translational and rotational reduction errors were 1.73 (0.97) mm and 2.57° (1.36°), respectively, which demonstrated the accuracy and reliability of the system.

      Interpretation

      The system allows surgeons to perform fracture reduction in an objective, efficient, and accurate manner yet minimize the radiation exposure and lessens the extent of tissue disruption around the fracture site during the reduction process.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bhandari M.
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Swiontkowski M.F.
        • Tornetta III, P.
        • Hanson B.
        • Weaver B.
        • Sprague S.
        • Schemitsch E.H.
        Surgeons’ preferences for the operative treatment of fractures of the tibial shaft. An international survey.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2001; : 1746-1752
        • Bottema O.
        • Roth B.
        Theoretical Kinematics.
        North-Holland, Amsterdam1979
      1. Campopiano, A., 1995. Manipulator for external bone fixation devices, USPO #US 5,397,322.

        • Chao E.Y.
        • Neluheni E.V.
        • Hsu R.W.
        • Paley D.
        Biomechanics of malalignment.
        Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1994; 25: 379-386
        • Cooke T.D.
        • Pichora D.
        • Siu D.
        • Scudamore R.A.
        • Bryant J.T.
        Surgical implications of various deformity of the knee with obliquity of joint surfaces.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1989; 71: 560-565
        • Craig J.J.
        Spatial descriptions and transformations.
        in: Craig J.J. Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control. Addision-Wesley, Reading, MA1989: 19-67
      2. Dewar, M.E., 1986. Fracture Reduction Apparatus, USPO #US 4,628,922.

        • Di Gregorio R.
        • Parenti-Castelli V.
        Kinematics of a six-DOF fixation device for long-bone fracture reduction.
        J. Robot. Syst. 2001; 18: 715-722
        • Di Gregorio R.
        • Parenti-Castelli V.
        Fixation devices for long bone fracture reduction: an overview and new suggestions.
        J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2002; 34: 265-278
        • Edge A.J.
        • Denham R.A.
        External fixation for complicated tibial fractures.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1981; : 92-97
        • Egger E.L.
        • Gottsauner-Wolf F.
        • Palmer J.
        • Aro H.T.
        • Chao E.Y.
        Effects of axial dynamization on bone healing.
        J. Trauma. 1993; 34: 185-192
        • Ellis R.
        • Toksvig-Larsen S.
        • Marcacci M.
        • Caramella D.
        • Fadda M.
        Use of a biocompatible fiducial marker in evaluating the accuracy of computed tomography image registration.
        Invest. Radiol. 1996; 31: 658-667
        • Green S.A.
        Complications of external skeletal fixation.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1983; : 109-116
        • Hay S.M.
        • Rickman M.
        • Saleh M.
        Fracture of the tibial diaphysis treated by external fixation and the axial alignment grid: a single surgeon’s experience.
        Injury. 1997; 28: 437-443
        • Helland P.
        • Boe A.
        • Molster A.O.
        • Solheim E.
        • Hordvik M.
        Open tibial fractures treated with the Ex-fi-re external fixation system.
        Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1996; : 209-220
        • Hofstetter R.
        • Slomczykowski M.
        • Krettek C.
        • Koppen G.
        • Sati M.
        • Nolte L.P.
        Computer-assisted fluoroscopy-based reduction of femoral fractures and antetorsion correction.
        Comput. Aided Surg. 2000; 5: 311-325
        • Hufner T.
        • Pohlemann T.
        • Tarte S.
        • Gansslen A.
        • Citak M.S.M.
        • Bazak N.
        • Culemann U.
        • Nolte L.P.
        • Krettek C.
        Computer-assisted fracture reduction: novel method for analysis of accuracy.
        Comput. Aided Surg. 2001; 6: 153-159
        • Kim Y.H.
        • Inoue N.
        • Chao E.Y.
        Kinematic simulation of fracture reduction and bone deformity correction under unilateral external fixation.
        J. Biomech. 2002; 35: 1047-1058
      3. Koo, T.K., Chao, E.Y., Mak, A.F., 2004. Determination of fixator configuration to facilitate controlled axial dynamization on long bone fractures. In: The 11th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, Hong Kong, PRC, August 1–6, 2004, pp. 218–219.

        • Koo T.K.
        • Chao E.Y.
        • Mak A.F.
        Development and validation of a new approach for computer-aided long bone fracture reduction using unilateral external fixator.
        J. Biomech. 2006; 39: 2104-2112
        • Lawyer Jr., R.B.
        • Lubbers L.M.
        Use of the Hoffmann apparatus in the treatment of unstable tibial fractures.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1980; 62: 1264-1273
        • Marsh J.L.
        • Nepola J.V.
        External fixation for open tibia fractures. A management strategy.
        Orthop. Rev. 1990; 19: 273-280
        • Moorcroft C.I.
        • Thomas P.B.
        • Ogrodnik P.J.
        • Verborg S.A.
        A device for improved reduction of tibial fractures treated with external fixation.
        Proc Inst. Mech. Eng. [H.]. 2000; 214: 449-457
      4. Moorcroft, C.I., Ogrodnik, P.J., Thomas, P.B., 2001. Fracture reduction device, USPO #US 6,328,737.

        • Paley D.
        • Chaudray M.
        • Pirone A.M.
        • Lentz P.
        • Kautz D.
        Treatment of malunions and mal-nonunions of the femur and tibia by detailed preoperative planning and the Ilizarov techniques.
        Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1990; 21: 667-691
        • Ron O.
        • Joskowicz L.
        • Milgrom C.
        • Simkin A.
        Computer-based periaxial rotation measurement for aligning fractured femur fragments from CT: a feasibility study.
        Comput. Aided Surg. 2002; 7: 332-341
        • Sanders R.
        • Koval K.J.
        • DiPasquale T.
        • Schmelling G.
        • Stenzler S.
        • Ross E.
        Exposure of the orthopaedic surgeon to radiation.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1993; 75: 326-330
      5. Taylor, J.C., 2005. Correction of general deformity with the Taylor Spatial Frame Fixator™. www.jcharlestaylor.com, 2005.

      6. Taylor, J.C., Austin, G.E., Taylor, H.S., 1999. Method of using an orthopaedic fixation device, USPO #US 5,971,984.

        • Viceconti M.
        • Andrisano A.O.
        • Toni A.
        • Giunti A.
        Automatic fracture reduction with a computer-controlled external fixator.
        Med. Eng. Phys. 1994; 16: 143-149
        • Waidelich H.A.
        • Strecker W.
        • Schneider E.
        Computed tomographic torsion-angle and length measurement of the lower extremity. The methods, normal values and radiation load.
        Rofo. 1992; 157: 245-251