Research Article| Volume 21, ISSUE 3, P314-321, March 2006

Effect of sock on biomechanical responses of foot during walking


      Background. Except the plantar pressure and gross joint motion, we know little about the mechanical state of a foot during walking. This study aimed at investigating the effect of wearing socks with different frictional properties on plantar shear, which is a possible mechanical risk factor of foot lesion development.
      Method. A 3-D finite element model for simulating the foot–sock–insole contact was developed to investigate the biomechanical effects of wearing socks with different combinations of frictional properties on the plantar foot contact. The dynamic plantar pressure and shear stress during the stance phases of gait were studied through finite element computations. Three cases were simulated, a barefoot with a high frictional coefficient against the insole (0.54) and two socks, one with a high frictional coefficient against the skin (0.54) and a low frictional coefficient against the insole (0.04) and another with an opposite frictional properties assignment.
      Findings. Wearing sock of low friction against the insole to allow more relative sliding between the plantar foot and footwear was found to reduce the shear force significantly: at the rearfoot from 3.1 to 0.88 N, and at the forefoot from 10.61 to 1.61 N. The shear force can be further reduced to 0.43 N at the rearfoot, and 1.18 N at the forefoot, when wearing the sock with low friction against the foot skin and high friction set against the insole.
      Interpretation. Wearing sock with low friction against the foot skin was found to be more effective in reducing plantar shear force on the skin than the sock with low friction against the insole. The risk of barefoot walking in developing plantar shear related blisters and ulcers might be reduced by socks wearing especially those with low friction against the foot skin.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Akhlaghi F.
        • Pepper M.G.
        In-shoe bi-axial shear force measurement: the Kent shear system.
        Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1996; 34: 315-317
        • Apelqvist J.
        • Larsson J.
        • Agardh C.D.
        The influence of external precipitating factors and peripheral neuropathy on the development and outcome of diabetic foot ulcers.
        J. Diabet. Complications. 1990; 4: 21-25
        • Ashman R.B.
        Properties of bone.
        in: Skalak R. Chien S. Handbook of Bioengineering. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York1986: 2.1-2.26
        • Buirski D.
        Just slip into something a little more comfortable.
        World Sports Activewear. 2000; 6: 49-50
        • Calderale P.M.
        • Scelfo G.
        A mathematical model of the locomotor apparatus.
        Eng. Med. 1987; 16: 147-161
        • Cavanagh P.R.
        • Hewitt F.G.J.
        • Perry J.E.
        In-shoe plantar pressure measurement: a review.
        Foot. 1992; 2: 185-194
        • Chen W.P.
        • Ju C.W.
        • Tang F.T.
        Effects of total contact insoles on the plantar stress redistribution: a finite element analysis.
        Clin. Biomech. 2003; 18: s17-s24
        • Cheung J.T.
        • Zhang M.
        A 3D finite element model of the human foot and ankle for insole design.
        Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2005; 86: 353-358
        • Cheung J.T.M.
        • Zhang M.
        • Leung A.K.L.
        • Fan Y.B.
        Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the foot during standing—a material sensitivity study.
        J. Biomech. 2005; 38: 1045-1054
        • Delporte C.
        New socks offer relief, blister guard system with Teflon reduces friction between foot and sock.
        America’s Textiles International. 1997; 26: K/A 10
        • Draper D.
        Coming down to earth.
        World Sports Activewear. 1999; 5: 53-55
        • Gefen A.
        Plantar soft tissue loading under the medial metatarsals in the standing diabetic foot.
        Med. Eng. Phys. 2003; 25: 491-499
        • Hosein R.
        • Lord M.
        A study of in-shoe plantar shear in normals.
        Clin. Biomech. 2000; 15: 46-53
        • Jacob S.
        • Patil M.K.
        Stress analysis in three-dimensional foot models of normal and diabetic neuropathy.
        Front. Med. Biol. Eng. 1999; 9: 211-227
        • Litzelman D.K.
        • Marriott D.J.
        • Vinicor F.
        The role of footwear in the prevention of foot lesions in patients with NIDDM.
        Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 156-162
        • Lord M.
        • Hosein R.
        • Williams R.B.
        A method for in-shoe shear stress measurement.
        J. Biomech. Eng. 1992; 14: 181-186
        • MacFarlane R.M.
        • Jeffcoate W.J.
        Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers.
        Diabet. Med. 1997; 16: 867-870
        • Maciejewshi M.L.
        • Reiber G.E.
        • Simth D.G.
        • Wallace C.
        • Hayes S.
        • Boyko E.J.
        Effectiveness of diabetic therapeutic footwear in preventing reulceration.
        Diabetes Care. 2004; 27: 1774-1782
        • Mayfield J.A.
        • Reiber G.E.
        • Sanders L.J.
        • Janisse D.
        • Pogach L.M.
        Preventive foot care in people with diabetes.
        Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 2161-2177
        • Mueller M.
        • Strube M.J.
        • Allen B.T.
        Therapeutic footwear can reduce plantar pressures in patients with diabetes and transmetatarsal amputation.
        Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 367-371
        • Phillips P.
        • Evans A.
        • Popplewell P.
        Diabetic foot ulcers, a guide to treatment.
        Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2000; 1: 117-123
        • Sanders J.E.
        • Greve J.M.
        • Mitchell S.B.
        • Zachariah S.G.
        Material properties of commonly-used interface materials and their static coefficient of friction with skin and socks.
        J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 1998; 35: 161-176
        • Scheffler N.M.
        All about socks.
        Diabetes Forecast. 2001; 54 (80–81): 78
        • Seireg A.
        • Arvikar R.J.
        The prediction of muscular load sharing and joint forces in the lower extremities during walking.
        J. Biomech. 1975; 8: 89-102
        • Thomas V.J.
        • Patial K.M.
        • Radhakrishnan S.
        Three-dimensional stress analysis for the mechanics of plantar ulcers in diabetic neuropathy.
        Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2004; 42: 230-235
        • Veves A.
        • Masson E.A.
        • Fernando D.J.S.
        • Boulton A.J.M.
        Use of experiment padded hosiery to reduce abnormal foot pressures in diabetic neuropathy.
        Diabetes Care. 1989; 12: 653-655
        • Viswanathan V.
        • Madhavan S.
        • Gnanasundaram S.
        • Gopalakrishna G.
        • Das B.N.
        • Rajasekar S.
        • Ramachandran A.
        Effectiveness of different types of footwear insoles for the dianetic neuropathic foot.
        Diabetes Care. 2004; 27: 474-477
        • Xiu Y.
        Advances in Sports Biomechanics.
        Guo Fang Gong Ye Press, Beijing1998
        • Zhang M.
        • Mak A.F.T.
        In vivo skin frictional properties.
        Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 1999; 23: 135-141