Advertisement

Sampling rate effects on surface EMG timing and amplitude measures

      Abstract

      Objective. To determine if oversampling the surface electromyographic signal provides any benefit in analyzing common electromyographic timing and amplitude measures used in kinesiological studies.
      Design. A within subjects (n=8) repeated measures design was used to examine surface electromyographic signals captured under four contraction modes and acquired with five different analog-to-digital sampling rates.
      Background. There is a growing trend to sample surface electromyography at rates higher than the Nyquist rate. Though there is limited evidence to support oversampling, the necessity or benefit of doing so remains unclear.
      Methods. Surface electromyography was recorded from the triceps brachii during maximal, submaximal, and fatiguing isometric contractions, as well as dynamic contractions. The analog signals were bandpassed between 20 Hz and 2 kHz, and oversampled at 6 kHz. The signals were then digitally resampled at 3 kHz, 1 kHz, 500 Hz, and 250 Hz without benefit of an anti-aliasing filter. Amplitude and timing variables measured from both the rectified and smoothed signal were compared across sampling rates.
      Results. Oversampling produced no significant changes in timing and amplitude measures of the rectified or smoothed electromyographic signal. For the smoothed signal, minor undersampling at half the Nyquist rate was sufficient to accurately capture most timing and signal strength measures.
      Conclusions. Oversampling is unnecessary to gather typical amplitude and timing measures from the surface electromyographic signal. Electromyography sampled below half the Nyquist rate is likely to result in a poor temporal and amplitude representation of the signal.Relevance
      Computer memory and processing resources for analyzing amplitude and timing information need not be expended in oversampling surface electromyography, and results of previous studies need not be outright dismissed because of minor undersampling violations or the lack of an anti-aliasing filter.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bullock-Saxton J.E.
        Local sensation changes and altered hip muscle function following severe ankle sprains.
        Phys. Ther. 1994; 74: 17-31
        • Clancy E.A.
        • Morin E.L.
        • Merletti R.
        Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography.
        J. Electromyogr. Kines. 2002; 12: 1-16
        • Conwit R.A.
        • Stashuk D.
        • Tracy B.
        • McHugh M.
        • Brown W.F.
        • Metter E.J.
        The relationship of motor unit size, firing rate and force.
        Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999; 110: 1270-1275
        • Gitter A.J.
        • Stovlov W.C.
        AAEM minimonograph #16: Instrumentation and measurement in electrodiagnostic medicine––part II.
        Muscle Nerve. 1995; 18: 812-824
        • Gottlieb G.L.
        • Corcos D.M.
        • Agarwal G.C.
        Organizing principles for single-joint movements. I. A speed-insensitive strategy.
        J. Neurophysiol. 1989; 62: 342-357
      1. Hermens, H., Freriks, B., Merletti, R., Stegeman, D., Blok, J., et al., 1999. European recommendations for surface electromyography. [SENIAM 8]. Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, NL

        • Hodges P.W.
        • Bui B.H.
        A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography.
        Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996; 101: 511-519
        • Jayne B.C.
        • Lauder G.V.
        • Reily S.M.
        • Wainwright P.C.
        The effect of sampling rate on the analysis of digital electromyograms from vertebrate muscle.
        J. Exp. Biol. 1990; 154: 557-565
        • Jørgensen S.Å.
        • Fuglsang-Frederiksen A.
        Turns-amplitude analysis at different sampling frequencies.
        Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1991; 81: 1-7
        • Kamen G.
        • Caldwell G.E.
        Physiology and interpretation of the electromyogram.
        J Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996; 13: 366-384
        • Micera S.
        • Sabatini A.M.
        • Dario P.
        An algorithm for detecting the onset of muscle contraction by EMG signal processing.
        Med. Eng. Phys. 1998; 20: 211-215
        • Nilsson J.
        • Panizza M.
        • Hallett M.
        Principles of digital sampling of a physiologic signal.
        Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1993; 89: 349-358
        • Pagnacco G.
        • Oggero E.
        • Morr D.R.
        • Berme N.
        Oversampling data acquisition to improve resolution of digitized signals.
        Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 1997; 34: 137-142
        • Sadhukhan A.K.
        • Goswami A.
        • Kumar A.
        • Gupta S.
        Effects of sampling frequency on EMG power spectral characteristics.
        Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1994; 34: 159-163
        • Soderberg G.L.
        • Knutson L.M.
        A guide for use and interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data.
        Phys. Ther. 2000; 80: 485-498
        • Staude G.
        • Wolf W.
        Objective motor response onset detection in surface myoelectric signals.
        Med. Eng. Phys. 1999; 21: 449-467
        • Winter D.A.
        Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement.
        Wiley Interscience, New York1990