Advertisement

Female and male trunk geometry: size and prediction of the spine loading trunk muscles derived from MRI

      Abstract

      Objective. Develop a gender specific database of trunk muscle cross-sectional areas across multiple levels of the thoracic and lumbar spine and develop prediction equations for the physiological cross-sectional area as a function of gender and anthropometry.
      Design. This study quantified trunk muscle cross-sectional areas of male and female spine loading muscles.
      Background. There is a lack of comprehensive data regarding the female spine loading muscle size. Although biomechanical models often assume females are the same as males, little is known regarding gender differences in terms of trunk muscle areas and no data exist regarding the prediction of trunk muscle physiological cross-sectional areas from commonly used external anthropometric measures.
      Methods. Magnetic resonance imaging scans through the vertebral bodies from T8 through S1 were performed on 20 females and 10 males. Muscle fiber angle corrected cross-sectional areas were recorded at each vertebral level. Linear regression techniques taking into account anthropometric measures were utilized to develop prediction equations for the physiological cross-sectional area for each muscle of interest, as well as tests for differences in cross-sectional areas due to gender and side of the body.
      Results. Significant gender differences were observed for the prediction of the erector spinae, internal and external obliques, psoas major and quadratus lumborum physiological cross-sectional areas. Anthropometric measures about the xyphoid process and combinations of height and weight resulted in better predictions of cross-sectional areas than when using traditional anthropometry.
      Conclusions. This study demonstrates that the trunk muscle geometry of females and males are different, and that these differences should be considered in the development of biomechanical models of the torso.Relevance
      The prediction of physiological cross-sectional areas from external anthropometric measures provide gender specific equations to assist in estimation of forces of muscles which load the spine for biomechanical purposes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Marras W.S.
        • Granata K.P.
        The development of an EMG-assisted model to assess spine loading during whole-body free-dynamic lifting.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1997; 7: 259-268
        • McGill S.M.
        • Norman R.W.
        Partitioning of the L4-5 dynamic moment into disc, ligamentous and muscular components during lifting.
        Spine. 1986; 11: 666-678
        • Schultz A.B.
        • Andersson G.B.J.
        Analysis of loads on the lumbar spine.
        Spine. 1981; 6: 76-82
        • Cooper R.D.
        • Hollis S.
        • Jayson M.I.V.
        Gender variation of human spinal and paraspinal structures.
        Clin Biomech. 1992; 7: 120-124
        • Fernand R.
        • Fox D.E.
        Evaluation of lumbar lordosis: a prospective and retrospective study.
        Spine. 1985; 10: 799-803
        • Bogduk N.
        • Johnson G.
        • Spalding D.
        The morphology and biomechanics of latissimus dorsi.
        Clin Biomech. 1998; 13: 377-385
        • Bogduk N.
        • Pearcy M.
        • Hadfield G.
        Anatomy and biomechanics of psoas major.
        Clin Biomech. 1992; 7: 109-119
        • Brand R.A.
        • Pedersen D.R.
        • Friederich J.A.
        The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area.
        J Biomech. 1986; 19: 589-596
        • Chaffin D.B.
        • Redfern M.S.
        • Erig M.
        • Goldstein S.A.
        Lumbar muscle size and locations from CT scans of 96 women of age 40 to 63 years.
        Clin Biomech. 1990; 5: 9-16
        • Reid J.G.
        • Costigan P.A.
        Geometry of adult rectus abdominis and erector spinae muscles.
        J Ortho Sports Phys Ther. 1985; 6: 278-280
        • Close R.I.
        Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles.
        Physiol Rev. 1972; 52: 129-197
      1. Green HJ. In: Jones NL, McGartney N, McComas AJ, editors. Muscle power: fiber type recruitment, metabolism and fatigue. Human muscle power 1986, p. 65–79

        • Narici M.
        Human skeletal muscle architecture studied in vivo by non-invasive imaging techniques: functional significance and applications.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1999; 9: 97-103
        • McGill S.M.
        • Santiguida L.
        • Stevens J.
        Measurement of the trunk musculature from T5 to L5 using MRI scans of 15 young males corrected for muscle fiber orientation.
        Clin Biomech. 1993; 8: 171-178
        • Dumas G.A.
        • Poulin M.J.
        • Roy B.
        • Gagnon M.
        • Jovanovic J.
        Orientation and moment arms of some trunk muscles.
        Spine. 1991; 16: 293-303
        • Macintosh J.E.
        • Bogduk N.
        The attachments of the lumbar erector spinae.
        Spine. 1991; 16: 783-792
        • McGill S.M.
        • Patt N.
        • Norman R.W.
        Measurements of the trunk musculature of active males using CT scan radiography: implications for force and moment generating capacity about the L4/L5 joint.
        J Biomech. 1988; 21: 329-341
        • Tracy M.F.
        • Gibson M.J.
        • Szypryt E.P.
        • Rutheford A.
        • Corlett E.N.
        The geometry of the muscles of the lumbar spine determined by magnetic resonance imaging.
        Spine. 1989; 14: 186-193
        • Schultz A.B.
        • Andersson G.B.J.
        • Haderspeck K.
        • Ortengren R.
        • Nordin M.
        • Bjork R.
        Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists.
        J Biomech. 1982; 15: 669-675
        • Wood S.
        • Pearsall D.J.
        • Ross R.
        • Reid J.G.
        Trunk muscle parameters determined from MRI for lean to obese males.
        Clin Biomech. 1996; 11: 139-144
        • Reid J.G.
        • Costigan P.A.
        • Comrie W.
        Prediction of trunk muscle areas and moment arms by use of anthropometric measures.
        Spine. 1987; 12: 273-275
        • Marras W.S.
        • Kim J.Y.
        Anthropometry of industrial populations.
        Ergonomics. 1993; 36: 371-378
        • McGill S.M.
        • Juker D.
        • Axler C.
        Correcting trunk muscle geometry obtained from MRI and CT scans of supine postures for use in standing postures.
        J Biomech. 1996; 29: 643-646