Advertisement

Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running

      Abstract

      Objective. To quantify the effects of medial foot orthoses on skeletal movements of the calcaneus and tibia during the stance phase in running.
      Design. Kinematic effects of medial foot orthoses (anterior, posterior, no support) were tested using skeletal (and shoe) markers at the calcaneus and tibia.
      Background. Previous studies using shoe and skin markers concluded that medially placed orthoses control/reduce foot eversion and tibial rotation. However, it is currently unknown if such orthoses also affect skeletal motion at the lower extremities.
      Methods. Intracortical Hofman pins with reflective marker triads were inserted under standard local anesthetic into the calcaneus and tibia of five healthy male subjects. The three-dimensional tibiocalcaneal rotations were determined using a joint coordinate system approach. Eversion (skeletal and shoe) and tibial rotation were calculated to study the foot orthoses effects.
      Results. Orthotic effects on eversion and tibial rotations were found to be small and unsystematic over all subjects. Differences between the subjects were significantly larger (p<0.01; up to 10°) than between the orthotic conditions (1–4°). Significant orthotic effects across subjects were found only for total internal tibial rotation; p<0.05).
      Conclusions. This in vivo study showed that medially placed foot orthoses did not change tibiocalcaneal movement patterns substantially during the stance phase of running.
      Relevance
      Orthoses may have only small kinematic effects on the calcaneus and tibia (measured with bone pins) as well as on the shoes (measured with shoe markers) during running of normal subjects. Present results showed that orthotic effects were subject specific and unsystematic across conditions. It is speculated that orthotic effects during the stance phase of running may be mechanical as well as proprioceptive.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • James S.L.
        • Bates B.T.
        • Osternig L.R.
        Injuries to runners.
        American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1978; 6: 40-50
        • van Mechelen W
        Running injuries, a review of the epidemiological literature.
        Sports Medicine. 1992; 14: 320-335
        • Smart G.W.
        • Taunton J.E.
        • Clement D.B.
        Achilles tendon disorders in runners – a review.
        Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1980; 12: 231-243
        • Clement D.B.
        • Taunton J.E.
        • Smart G.W.
        • McNicol K.L.
        A survey of overuse running injuries.
        The Physician and Sports Medicine. 1981; 9: 47-58
        • Segesser B
        • Nigg B.M.
        Insertionstendinosen am Schienbein, Achillodynie und. Überlastungsfolgen am Fuss. – Ätiologie, Biomechanik, therapeutische Möglichkeiten.
        Orthopaede. 1980; 9: 207-214
        • Viitasalo J.T.
        • Kvist M
        Some biomechanical aspects of the foot and ankle athletes with and without shin splints.
        The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1983; 11: 125-130
      1. James SL, Jones DC. Biomechanical aspects of distance running injuries. In: Cavanagh PR, editor. Biomechanics of distance running. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1990:249–269

        • Gross M.L.
        • Davlin L.B.
        • Evanski P.M.
        Effectiveness of orthotic shoe inserts in the long-distance runner.
        The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1991; 19: 409-412
        • Feuerbach J.W.
        • Grabiner M.D.
        • Koh T.J.
        • Weiker G.G.
        Effect of an ankle orthosis and ankle ligament anaesthesia on ankle joint proprioception.
        American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1994; 22: 223-229
        • Cappozzo A
        • Catani F
        • Leardini A
        • Benedetti M.G.
        • Della Croce U
        Position and orientation in space of bones during movement, experimental artefacts.
        Clinical Biomechanics. 1996; 11: 90-100
        • Reinschmidt C
        • van den Bogert A.J.
        • Murphy N
        • Lundberg A
        • Nigg B.M.
        Tibiocalcaneal motion during running, measured with external and bone markers.
        Clinical Biomechanics. 1997; 12: 8-16
      2. Cavanagh PR, Clarke TE, Williams KR, Kalenak A. An evaluation of the effect of orthotics on pressure distribution and rearfoot movement during running. Proceedings of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. New York: Lake Placid, 1978

        • Taunton J.E.
        • Clement D.B.
        • Smart G.W.
        • Wiley J.P.
        • McNicol K.L.
        A triplanar electrogoniometer investigation of running mechanics in runners with compensatory overpronation.
        Canadian Journal of Applied Sports Science. 1985; 10: 104-115
      3. Clarke TE, Frederick EC, Hamill CL. The study of rearfoot movement in running. In: Frederick EC, editor. Sport shoes and playing surfaces. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1984:166–189

        • van Woensel W
        • Cavanagh P.R.
        A perturbation study of lower extremity motion during running.
        Journal of Sports Biomechanics. 1992; 8: 30-47
        • Milani T.L.
        • Schnabel G
        • Hennig E.M.
        Rearfoot motion and pressure distribution patterns during running in shoes with varus and valgus wedges.
        Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 1995; 11: 177-187
        • Bates B.T.
        • James S.L.
        • Osternig L.R.
        Foot function during the support phase of running.
        American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1979; 7: 328
        • Rodgers N.M.
        • LeVeau B.F.
        Effectiveness of foot orthotic devices used to modify pronation in runners.
        The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 1982; 4: 86-90
        • Eng J.J.
        • Pierrynowski M.R.
        The effect of soft foot orthotics on three-dimensional lower-limb kinematics during walking and running.
        Physical Therapy. 1994; 74: 836-843
      4. Nigg BM, Bahlsen A, Denoth J, Luthi S, Stacoff A. Factors influencing kinetic and kinematic variables in running. In: Nigg BM, editor. Biomechanics of running shoes. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1986:139–160

        • Nigg B.M.
        • Kahn A
        • Fisher V
        • Stefanyshyn D
        The effect of shoe insert construction on foot and leg movement during running.
        Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1998; 30: 550-555
        • Olerud C
        • Rosendahl Y
        Torsion-transmitting properties of the hind foot.
        Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1985; 214: 285-294
      5. Lundberg A. Kinematics of the ankle and foot, in vivo roentgen stereophoto-grammetry. Acta Orthop. Scand 1989;60 Suppl. 233:1–26

        • Hintermann B
        • Nigg B.M.
        • Sommer C
        Foot movement and tendon excursion, An in vitro study.
        Foot and International. 1994; 15: 386-395
        • Inman V.T.
        The influence of the foot-ankle complex on the proximal skeletal structures.
        Artificial Limbs. 1969; 13: 59-65
        • Reinschmidt C
        • van den Bogert A.J.
        • Lundberg A
        • Murphy N
        • Nigg B.M.
        • Stacoff A
        • Stano A
        Tibiofemoral and tibiocalcaneal motion during walking: external vs. skeletal markers.
        Gait and Posture. 1997; 6: 98-109
      6. Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ. KineMat, a MATLAB™ toolbox for the reconstruction of spatial marker positions and the analysis of three-dimensional joint movements. http,//www.Iri.ccf.org/isb/software/kinemat/, 1997c

        • Cole G.K.
        • Nigg B.M.
        • Ronsky J.L.
        • Yeadon M.R.
        Application of the joint coordinate system to three-dimensional joint attitude and movement representation, a standardization proposal.
        Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 1993; 115: 344-349
        • Nigg B.M.
        • Cole G.K.
        • Nachbauer W
        Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running.
        Journal of Biomechanics. 1993; 26: 909-916
      7. Stergiou P. Biomechanical factors associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome in runners. Unpublished Master Thesis. The University of Calgary, Alta., Canada, 1996

        • McClay I.S.
        • Manal K
        Coupling parameters in runners with normal and excessive pronation.
        Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 1997; 13: 109-124
        • Levens A.S.
        • Inman V.T.
        • Blosser J.A.
        Transverse rotation of the segments of the lower extremity in locomotion.
        Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am]. 1948; 30: 859-872
        • Lafortune M.A.
        • Cavanagh P.R.
        • Sommer III H.J.
        • Kalenak A
        Foot inversion–eversion and knee kinematics during walking.
        Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1994; 12: 412-420
        • Perry S.D.
        • Lafortune M.A.
        Influences of inversion/eversion of the foot upon impact loading during locomotion.
        Clinical Biomechanics. 1995; 5: 253-257
      8. Smart G, Robertson G. Triplanar electrogoniometer analysis of running gait. In: Winter DA, et al. editors. Proceedings of the IXth International Congress of Biomechanics. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 1985:144–148

        • van Gheluwe W
        • Tielemans R
        • Roosen P
        The influence of heel counter rigidity on rearfoot motion during running.
        Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 1995; 11: 47-67
      9. Stähelin T, Nigg BM, van den Bogert AJ, Stefanyshyn DJ, Herzog W. Die Rolle dynamischer Stabilisatoren bei der Kontrolle von Knochenbewegungen des Sprunggelenkkomplexes. [The role of dynamic stabilisers controlling the movement of bones at the ankle]. Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift 1997;127 Suppl. 91:35S

        • Fromme A
        • Winkelmann F
        • Thorwesten L
        • Reer R
        • Jerosch J
        Dependency of rearfoot pronation on physical strain during running.
        Sportverletzungen, Sportschaden. 1997; 11: 52-57
        • Engsberg J.R.
        • Andrews J.G.
        Kinematic analysis of the talocalcaneal/talocrural joint during running support.
        Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1987; 19: 275-284