The frictional properties at the thoracic skin–fascia interface: implications in spine manipulation

  • David E. Bereznick
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Kinesiology, Spine Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada N2L 3G1

    Division of Chiropractic Sciences, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ont., Canada M4G 3E6
    Search for articles by this author
  • J. Kim Ross
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Kinesiology, Spine Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada N2L 3G1

    Division of Chiropractic Sciences, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ont., Canada M4G 3E6
    Search for articles by this author
  • Stuart M. McGill
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Kinesiology, Spine Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada N2L 3G1
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Objective. To assess the friction at the thoracic skin–fascia interface to determine the potential reaction force vectors during thoracic manual therapy.
      Design. A basic in vivo study of human subjects, documenting the frictional properties at the interface between the thoracic skin and underlying fascia.
      Background. Chiropractors, and other spine manipulative therapists, during thoracic manipulation have been attempting to apply force vectors to spine tissues in specific directions in addition to those applied normal to the skin. For obliquely applied forces to be directly transmitted to the underlying vertebrae, either friction is required at the skin–fascia interface or the applied force must “hook” on a bony process.
      Methods. Subjects were placed in the prone position with the thoracic skin exposed. The posterior thoracic region was loaded with normal forces, incrementally from 125.3 to 392.9 N. The interface between the load and the skin was either a plexiglass plate or modelled hands. A force was then applied to either apparatus in the cephalad direction. The applied forces and corresponding displacements were measured using a load cell and an optoelectronic camera system, respectively. Chiropractors then performed actual thoracic manipulation to determine if they could maintain their location of contacts (spinous process/transverse process) on the underlying vertebra.
      Results. Each of the subjects exhibited negligible friction between the thoracic skin and underlying fascia for both the plexiglass and modelled hand contacts. Furthermore, in each case, the apparatus travelled a distance greater than that between two transverse or spinous processes without showing an abrupt change in the slope of the force–displacement curves. The hands of chiropractors performing thoracic manipulation travelled a similar distance during the dynamic thrust.
      Conclusions. The skin–fascia interface over the thoracic spine exhibits negligible friction. Therefore, the reaction force from a thoracic vertebra will be normal to the overlying skin. Furthermore, the data show that the ability to “hook” either a thoracic transverse or spinous process in the superior–inferior direction during a manipulative thrust may be greatly over-rated.Relevance
      During thoracic spinal manipulation, one cannot direct a force vector to a thoracic vertebra at a given angle by simply directing their thrust in that direction.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bergmann T.F.
        • Peterson D.H.
        • Lawrence D.J.
        Chiropractic technique: principles and procedures. first ed. Churchill Livingston Inc, New York1993: 347
        • Grice A.
        Thoracic and costovertebral subluxation syndromes.
        in: Gatterman M.I. Foundations of chiropractic subluxation. Mosby, St.Louis1995: 407
      1. Szaraz ZT. Compendium of chiropractic technique. Division of Chiropractic Sciences, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 1990

        • Conway P.J.W.
        • Herzog W.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Hasler E.M.
        • Ladly K.
        Forces required to cause cavitation during spinal manipulation of the thoracic spine.
        Clin. Biomech. 1993; 8: 210-214
        • Herzog W.
        • Conway P.J.
        • Kawchuk G.N.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Hasler E.M.
        Forces exerted during spinal manipulative therapy.
        Spine. 1993; 18: 1206-1212
        • Lanir Y.
        • Fung Y.C.
        Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin-II. Experimental results.
        J. Biomech. 1974; 7: 171-182
        • Reihsner R.
        • Balogh B.
        • Menzel E.J.
        Two-dimensional elastic properties of human skin in terms of an incremental model at the in vivo configuration.
        Med. Eng. Phys. 1995; 17: 304-313
        • Tong P.
        • Fung Y.C.
        The stress–strain relationship for the skin.
        J. Biomech. 1976; 9: 649-657
        • Sanders J.E.
        • Greve J.M.
        • Mitchell S.B.
        • Zachariah S.G.
        Material properties of commonly-used interface materials and their static coefficients of friction with skin and socks.
        J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 1998; 35: 161-176
        • Zhang M.
        • Mac A.F.
        In vivo friction properties of human skin.
        Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 1999; 23: 135-141