Advertisement

Boundary line between the strength and endurance regions in manual lifting

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Previous work by Mital et al. showed that repetitive dynamic strength (RDS) of individuals is a better predictor of psychophysically acceptable weight (PAW) than either the maximal dynamic strength (MDS) or maximal static strengths (MSSs). It was also pointed out that somewhere between a frequency of one lift per minute and a frequency of three lifts per minute, the orientation of lifting tasks changes and muscular strengths no longer remain the limiting factor. This paper reports the results of a follow-up study conducted to pinpoint the lifting frequency just beyond which this transition takes place. The results indicated that a significant correlation existed between RDS and PAW for lifting frequencies up to 1·5 lifts per minute. Beyond 1·5 lifts per minute, no significant correlation between the two measures was found. We therefore concluded that lifting tasks performed every 40 seconds, or less frequently, are strength oriented. For those tasks which require lifting more frequently than once every 40 seconds, individual's strengths are not a limiting factor.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Biomechanics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mital A.
        • Channaveeraiah C.
        • Fard H.F.
        • Khaledi H.
        Reliability of repetitive dynamic strengths as a screening tool for manual lifting tasks.
        Clin Biomech. 1986; 1: 125-129
        • Pytel J.L.
        • Kamon E.
        Dynamic strength as a predictor for maximal acceptable lifting.
        Ergonomics. 1981; 24: 663-672
        • Kamon E.
        • Kiser D.
        • Pytel J.L.
        Dynamic and static lifting capacity and muscular strength of steelmill workers.
        Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1982; 43: 853-857
        • Kroemer K.H.E.
        Development of ‘LIFTEST’, a dynamic technique to assess individual capability to lift material.
        NIOSH Report No. 210-79-0041. 1982; (Cincinnati, Ohio)
        • Mital A.
        • Karwowski W.
        Use of simulated job dynamic strengths (SJDS) in screening workers for manual lifting tasks.
        in: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, California1985: 513-516
        • Mital A.
        • Karwowski W.
        • Mazouz A.K.
        • Orsarh E.
        Prediction of maximum acceptable weight of lift in the horizontal and vertical planes using simulated job dynamic strengths.
        Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986; 47: 288-292
        • Dales J.L.
        • Macdonald E.B.
        • Anderson J.A.D.
        The ‘Liftest’ strength test-an accurate method of dynamic strength assessment?.
        Clin Biomech. 1986; 1: 11-13
        • Mital A.
        • Vinayagamoorthy R.
        Three-dimensional dynamic strength measuring device: a prototype.
        Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1984; 45: B9-B12
        • Mital A.
        Maximum weights of lift acceptable to male and female industrial workers for extended work shifts.
        Ergonomics. 1984; 27: 1115-1126