Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 359-364, June 1998

The effects of external mechanical stimulation on the healing of diaphyseal osteotomies fixed by flexible external fixation

  • S. Wolf

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests to: Dipl.-Ing. S. Wolf, Abteilung Unfallchirurgische Forschung und Biomechanik, Universität Ulm Klinikum, Helmholtzstraβe 14, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
    • Abteilung Unfallchirurgische Forschung und Biomechanik, Universität, Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • A. Janousek

      Affiliations

    • Unfallkrankenhaus Lorenz Böhler, Wien, Austria
  • ,
  • J. Pfeil

      Affiliations

    • Orthopädische Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • ,
  • W. Veith

      Affiliations

    • Ingenieurbüro Dr. W. Veith, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • F. Haas

      Affiliations

    • Ingenieurbüro F. Haas, Künzelsau, Germany
  • ,
  • G. Duda

      Affiliations

    • Abteilung Unfallchirurgische Forschung und Biomechanik, Universität, Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • L. Claes

      Affiliations

    • Abteilung Unfallchirurgische Forschung und Biomechanik, Universität, Ulm, Germany

Received 15 September 1997; accepted 28 November 1997.

Abstract 

Objective. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of an externally applied mechanical stimulus on fracture healing under flexible fixation.

Design. Stimulation of fracture healing under various conditions of interfragmentary movement in an in vivo fracture model on 41 sheep.

Background. It is generally accepted that small interfragmentary movements (IFMs) yield better bone healing results than larger IFMs (> 1 mm). However, the optimal size of IFM within the 1-mm range remains undetermined.

Methods. Standardized transverse osteotomy of 3 mm gap size in the left ovine tibia was fixed with an unilateral external fixator. The sheep were divided into four IFM groups of 0.0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 mm and stimulated with this amplitude for 1200 cycles per day at 1 Hz. After a healing period of 6 weeks, bone mineral density and biomechanical stability were evaluated to determine the quality of healing.

Results. The amount of callus formation increased significantly with increasing IFM (P < 0.05). However, highest biomechanical stability of the healed bone and mineral density of the gap tissue was achieved with an IFM of 0.4 mm, although the differences were not significant.

Conclusions. These results suggest that the optimal interfragmentary movement for acceleration of delayed fracture healing is in the range of 0.5 mm. However, the enhancement of the healing of flexibly-fixed fractures by external application of interfragmentary movement is limited.

Keywords:  Fracture healing, Interfragmentary movement, Enhancement

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0268-0033(98)00097-7

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 359-364, June 1998