Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 14, Issue 1 , Pages 14-23, January 1999

Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking

  • Uangthip Rattanaprasert

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe 2141, Australia
    • ,
  • Richard Smith

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe 2141, Australia
    • ,
  • Martin Sullivan

      Affiliations

    • St. Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, Australia
    • ,
  • Wendy Gilleard

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe 2141, Australia

Received 2 June 1997; accepted 30 March 1998.

Abstract 

Background. Many studies have shown that lack of functional activity of tibialis posterior leads to changes in the longitudinal arch and affects the motion of the foot. A quantitative description of the affects on the motion of the foot in detail has not been reported.

Objective. To describe three-dimensional motion of the leg, rearfoot and forefoot with tibialis posterior dysfunction during stance phase of walking in comparison with normals. This study compared one case without the function of tibialis posterior with the ensemble average of 10 normals (five males, five females).

Methods. Subjects with 10, 12 mm retroreflective markers placed on their right leg, rearfoot and forefoot, performed five trials of walking at self-selected speed on a 10 m walkway. A four-camera three-dimensional motion analysis system and a synchronized force platform were used to record three-dimensional motions of the segments and force variables during stance phase of walking.

Results. The patterns and range of motion of the rearfoot relative to the leg, and the forefoot relative to the rearfoot demonstrated some differences between the tibialis posterior dysfunction case and normals. Most of the major differences occurred from just prior to heel-off through to toe-off, the period when a stable arch would be required.

Conclusion. The observed differences in the three-dimensional foot motions of the tibialis posterior dysfunction case compared with normals during walking were consistent with the expected mechanical consequences of a foot without the function of tibialis posterior. The one exception was the inversion of the rearfoot which remained normal.

Keywords:  Gait, Walking, Stance, Three-dimensional analysis, Rearfoot kinematics, Forefoot kinematics, Tibialis posterior

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0268-0033(98)00034-5

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 14, Issue 1 , Pages 14-23, January 1999

Article Tools