Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 27-35, January 1998

Discrimination between maximal and submaximal effort in lumbar dynamometry

Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands

Received 1 July 1996; accepted 16 July 1997.

Abstract 

Objective. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in consistency between maximum, preferred and a low level trunk performance. It was hypothesized that if maximum effort yielded consistent performances while submaximal efforts were less consistent, a consistency parameter could be used to detect lack of effort.

Design. Survey study.

Methods. Eleven healthy subjects performed lumbar dynamometry measurements (Isostation-B200) with maximum, preferred and low effort. A standard protocol was used and velocity and static torque were measured. Five subjects performed three measurements with low effort and trained the low effort level in between to determine the impact of training on consistency of submaximal performances. Coefficient of variations (CV), percentage differences and onset slopes were used to determine consistency.

Results. Results show that maximum and preferred effort are equally consistent. Maximum and low effort and preferred and low effort show small significant differences in CV for some velocity and isometric torque parameters. No significant differences between the three performance levels were indicated for percentage differences and onset slopes. Training did not improve the consistency of the measurements.

Conclusions. Small significant differences in CV were found between maximal and submaximal effort. However the combination with the relatively large standard deviations make it unlikely that this parameter can be used for a reliable discrimination.

Keywords:  low back, dynamometry, maximum effort, preferred effort, low effort, consistency

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0268-0033(97)00083-1

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 27-35, January 1998