Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 12, Issue 6 , Pages 383-392, September 1997

The relationship between elbow flexor volume and angular stiffness at the elbow

  • Gary S. Chleboun

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprints requests to: Dr Gary S. Chleboun, Ohio University, School of Physical Therapy, 199 Convocation Center, Athens, OH 45701, USA.
    • Ohio University School of Physical Therapy, Athens, OH, USA
  • ,
  • John N Howell

      Affiliations

    • Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine and Department of Biological Sciences, Athens, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Robert R Conatser

      Affiliations

    • Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine and Department of Biological Sciences, Athens, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Jeffrey J Giesey

      Affiliations

    • Ohio University Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Athens, OH, USA

Received 29 August 1996; accepted 26 March 1997.

Abstract 

Objective. The purpose of this experiment was to determine if a correlation exists between the volume of the elbow flexors and angular stiffness at the elbow, and to determine the contribution of the biceps brachii and the brachialis muscles to angular stiffness.

Design. This study is a descriptive, correlational study and presents a graphical model of the passive properties of muscle.

Background. The correlation between arm volume and angular stiffness has been shown, but the measurement of arm volume was not specific to the structures being strained. Pre-positioning a bi-articular muscle by stretching over one joint decreases the range of motion at the other joint and may affect the stiffness.

Methods. Angular stiffness at the elbow of 14 female and 15 male volunteers was measured, and the volume of the elbow flexors was calculated from compounded ultra-sound imaging. Initial biceps length was set by pre-positioning the shoulder in two different positions.

Results. A significant linear relationship was observed between the slope of phase 1 of the stiffness curve and volume of the elbow flexors in both horizontal flexion (r = 0.92) and horizontal extension (r = 0.79) of the shoulder. Phase 2 of the stiffness curve showed no linear relationship to muscle volume in either shoulder position (flexion, r = 0.22; extension r = 0.33). The slopes of phases 1 and 2 were significantly greater with the shoulder in horizontal extension than in horizontal flexion.

Conclusion. The volume of the elbow flexor muscles is a good predictor of angular stiffness in phase 1 of the curve. A model of the additive contribution of the biceps and brachialis muscles is presented to account for the increased stiffness in the shoulder extended position.

Keywords:  Skeletal muscle stiffness, muscle volume, compounded ultrasound imaging

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0268-0033(97)00027-2

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 12, Issue 6 , Pages 383-392, September 1997