Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 202-208, February 2012

Comfort and midfoot mobility rather than orthosis hardness or contouring influence their immediate effects on lower limb function in patients with anterior knee pain

  • Kathryn Mills

      Affiliations

    • School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    • Department of Physical Therapies, Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, Australia
  • ,
  • Peter Blanch

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapies, Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, Australia
  • ,
  • Bill Vicenzino

      Affiliations

    • School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.

Received 14 February 2011; accepted 18 August 2011. published online 19 September 2011.

Abstract 

Background

Despite evidence for use of foot orthoses in the treatment of anterior knee pain, there is a paucity of research into their mechanisms of action. This study (i) determined the immediate lower limb kinematics and muscle activity adaptations, and (ii) evaluated the effect of individual's comfort and foot mobility.

Methods

Forty individuals diagnosed with anterior knee pain were measured for lower limb kinematics and electromyographic activity (via surface electrodes) while they jogged in three prefabricated contoured orthoses (hard, medium and soft) and a soft-flat orthosis. Subjects ranked orthoses in order of comfort.

Findings

Soft orthoses were more comfortable. No immediate adaptations in kinematics and electromyographic activity were observed when orthoses were added to shoes. There were few effects of perceived comfort and foot mobility, one being a significant interaction in frontal plane hip motion (Pillai's V=0.089, P=0.031) with the least comfortable orthosis producing the greatest relative adduction in those with mobile feet (0.54° (standard deviation 0.87)). Other main effects were a significant increase in vastus lateralis activity when wearing the least comfortable orthosis (6.94%, P=0.007) and a delay in offset of medial gastrocnemius in individuals with less mobile feet (1.51%, P=0.045).

Interpretation

It is becoming apparent that it is important to use more comfortable foot orthoses in a condition like anterior knee pain, where there is an associated increased hip adduction and vastus lateralis activity with least comfortable orthoses. Future research is needed to determine adaptations after ongoing wearing of orthoses.

Keywords: Foot orthoses, Comfort, Foot mobility, Electromyography, Kinematics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0268-0033(11)00222-1

doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.08.011

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 202-208, February 2012