Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 25, Issue 8 , Pages 759-764, October 2010

Analyzing glenohumeral torque–rotation response in vivo

  • Christina L. Beardsley

      Affiliations

    • McClure Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, College of Medicine,438 Stafford Hall, Burlington, VT 05405, United States
  • ,
  • Alan B. Howard

      Affiliations

    • Academic Computing Services, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, College of Medicine,438 Stafford Hall, Burlington, VT 05405, United States
  • ,
  • Scott M. Wisotsky

      Affiliations

    • McClure Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, College of Medicine,438 Stafford Hall, Burlington, VT 05405, United States
  • ,
  • Adam B. Shafritz

      Affiliations

    • McClure Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, College of Medicine,438 Stafford Hall, Burlington, VT 05405, United States
  • ,
  • Bruce D. Beynnon

      Affiliations

    • McClure Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, College of Medicine,438 Stafford Hall, Burlington, VT 05405, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Received 3 November 2009; accepted 3 June 2010. published online 07 July 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Because the human shoulder has many degrees of freedom that allow redundant means of producing the same net humerothoracic motion, there are many impediments to objective, repeatable assessment of shoulder function in vivo. Devices designed to date have suffered from poor reliability. In this study we introduce a new device and methods to evaluate human shoulder kinematics and evaluate its reproducibility from subject to subject and from day to day.

Methods

This was a controlled laboratory study. Using electromagnetic motion sensors to record the position and orientation of the thorax, scapula, and humerus, we quantified the kinematic response of twenty four normal shoulders in response to known internal–external torque application. A four-parameter logistic function was selected to characterize the strident features of the torque–rotation relationship.

Findings

Our analysis in conjunction with the measurement technique described herein, allowed the passive glenohumeral internal–external range of motion to be differentiated from other motion components and was determined to within 9.6% of full scale over three repeated trials. Range of motion was the most reliable biomechanical outcome, more so than computed indices of glenohumeral flexibility and hysteresis. The exact profile of the torque–rotation response, and therefore the repeatability of the calculated outcomes, was unique from shoulder to shoulder.

Interpretation

The development of the capacity for precise, non-invasive measurement of shoulder biomechanics over time is a requisite step towards optimizing treatment of shoulder injury and disease. Our current methods are superior to previous attempts at trying to non-invasively evaluate the biomechanics of the glenohumeral joint.

Keywords: Shoulder, Kinematics, Biomechanics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0268-0033(10)00166-X

doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.006

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 25, Issue 8 , Pages 759-764, October 2010