Journal Home
Search for

Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 154-158 (February 2010)


View previous. 11 of 16 View next.

Joint-specific power absorption during eccentric cycling

Steven J. ElmeraCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Matthew L. Madigana, Paul C. LaStayoabc, James C. Martina

Received 10 August 2009; accepted 27 October 2009. published online 23 November 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Previous investigators have reported that long term eccentric cycling increases muscle size and strength in a variety of populations. The joint-specific strategies used to absorb power during eccentric cycling, however, have not been identified. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the extent to which ankle, knee, and hip joint actions absorb power during eccentric cycling.

Methods

Eight active males resisted the reverse moving pedals of an isokinetic eccentric ergometer (60rpm) while targeting 20% of their maximum concentric cycling power. Pedal reaction forces and joint kinematics were recorded with an instrumented pedal and instrumented spatial linkage system, respectively. Joint powers were calculated using inverse dynamics; averaged over complete crank revolutions and over extension and flexion phases; and differences were assessed with a one-way ANOVA.

Findings

Ankle, knee, and hip joint actions absorbed 10 (SD 3)%, 58 (SD 8)%, and 29 (SD 9)% of the total power, respectively, with 3 (SD 1)% transferred across the hip. The main power absorbing actions were eccentric knee extension (−139 (SD 21) watts), eccentric hip extension (−51 (SD 31) watts), and eccentric hip flexion (−25 (SD 6) watts).

Interpretation

Eccentric cycling was performed with a combination of knee and hip joint actions which is consistent with submaximal concentric cycling. These data support and extend previous work that eccentric cycling improves knee extensor function and hip extensor muscle cross sectional area. Such information may allow clinicians to take even greater advantage of eccentric cycling as a rehabilitation modality.

a Department of Exercise and Sport Science, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

b Department of Physical Therapy, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

c Department of Orthopaedics, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Exercise and Sport Science, The University of Utah, 250 S. 1850 E. Room 241, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0920, USA.

PII: S0268-0033(09)00253-8

doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.10.014


View previous. 11 of 16 View next.