Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 10 , Pages 866-871, December 2009

Triceps-surae musculotendinous stiffness: Relative differences between obese and non-obese postmenopausal women

  • Aurélio Faria

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sport Science – CIDESD, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Ronaldo Gabriel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sport Sciences, Exercise and Health – CITAB, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
  • ,
  • João Abrantes

      Affiliations

    • MovLab, University of Lusophone Humanities and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal
  • ,
  • Rui Brás

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sport Science – CIDESD, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
  • ,
  • Helena Moreira

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sport Sciences, Exercise and Health–CIDESD, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

Received 27 February 2009; accepted 29 July 2009. published online 25 August 2009.

Abstract 

Background

There is a lack of research into the relationship between obesity and muscle–tendon unit stiffness in postmenopausal women. Muscle–tendon unit stiffness appears to affect human motion performance and excessive and insufficient stiffness can increase the risk of bone and soft tissue injuries, respectively. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between muscle–tendon unit stiffness and obesity in postmenopausal women.

Methods

105 postmenopausal women (58 [SD 5.5] years) participated. Four groups (normal weight, pre-obese, obesity class I and obesity class II) were defined according World Health Organization classification of body mass index. The ankle muscle–tendon unit stiffness was assessed in vivo with a free oscillation technique using a load of 30% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction.

Findings

ANOVA shows significant difference in muscle–tendon unit stiffness among the groups defined (P<0.001). Post hoc analysis reveals significant differences between the following groups: normal weight–pre-obese; normal weight–obesity class I and normal weight–obesity class II. The normal weight group had stiffness of 15789 (SD 2969) N/m, pre-obese of 19971 (SD 3678) N/m, obesity class I of 21435 (SD 4295) N/m, and obesity class II of 23497 (SD 1776) N/m.

Interpretation

Obese subjects may have increased muscle–tendon unit stiffness because of fat infiltration in leg skeletal muscles, range of motion restrictions and stability/posture reasons and might be more predisposed to develop musculoskeletal injuries. Normal weight group had identical stiffness values to those reported in studies where subjects were not yet menopausal, suggesting that stiffness might not be influenced by menopause.

Keywords: Biomechanics, Ankle, Musculotendinous stiffness, Obesity, Menopause

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0268-0033(09)00174-0

doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.07.015

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 10 , Pages 866-871, December 2009