Journal Home
Search for

Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 799-806 (December 2009)


View previous. 4 of 16 View next.

Creation of an asymmetrical gradient of back muscle activity and spinal stiffness during asymmetrical hip extension

Y. HuaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Y.L. Wongac, William W. Lua, Gregory N. Kawchukb

Received 11 February 2009; accepted 13 July 2009. published online 25 August 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Low back pain is often associated with increased spinal stiffness which thought to arise from increased muscle activity. Unfortunately, the association between paraspinal muscle activity and paraspinal stiffness, as well as the spatial distribution of this relation, is unknown. The purpose of this investigation was to employ new technological developments to determine the relation between spinal muscle contraction and spinal stiffness over a large region of the lumbar spine.

Methods

Thirty-two male subjects performed graded isometric prone right hip extension at four different exertion levels (0%, 10%, 25% and 50% of the maximum voluntary contraction) to induce asymmetric back muscle activity. The corresponding stiffness and muscle activity over bilateral paraspinal lumbar regions was measured by indentation loading and topography surface electromyography, respectively. Paraspinal stiffness and muscle activity were then plotted and their correlation was determined.

Findings

Data from this study demonstrated the existence of an asymmetrical gradient in muscle activation and paraspinal stiffness in the lumbar spine during isometric prone right hip extension. The magnitude and scale of the gradient increased with the contraction force. A positive correlation between paraspinal stiffness and paraspinal muscle activity existed irrespective of the hip extension effort (Pearson correlation coefficient, range 0.566–0.782 (P<0.001)).

Interpretation

Our results demonstrate the creation of an asymmetrical gradient of muscle activity and paraspinal stiffness during right hip extension. Future studies will determine if alterations in this gradient may possess diagnostic or prognostic value for patients with low back pain.

a Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong

b Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada

c Department of Physiotherapy, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

PII: S0268-0033(09)00171-5

doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.07.013


View previous. 4 of 16 View next.