Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 88-92, January 2007

Measurement of the tensile strength of the ventral abdominal wall in comparison with scar tissue

Kaiserin Elisabeth Hospital, Department of Surgery, Huglgasse 1-3; A-1150 Vienna, Austria

Received 22 February 2006; accepted 6 June 2006. published online 12 August 2006.

Abstract 

Background. Paramedian laparotomies lead to incisional hernias in approximately 30% of cases. In contrast, incisional hernias occur very rarely in the linea alba or the ventral abdominal wall. In this setting we investigated the difference between scar tissue and the non-incised abdominal wall tissue.

Methods. At the post mortem examination of 66 recently deceased individuals, accurately measured pieces of resected tissue from the linea alba, the anterior and the posterior rectus sheath, and scar tissue following median laparotomy, were exposed to tensile loads.

Findings. In the epigastric region the tissue ruptured at a mean horizontal load of 10.0 (SD 3.4) N/mm2 in the linea alba and 6.9 (SD 2.5) N/mm2 in scar tissue (P<0.001), and at a mean vertical load of 4.5 (SD 2.0) N/mm2 in the linea alba and 3.3 (SD 1.6) N/mm2 in scar tissue (P<0.05). In the hypogastric region as well, scar tissue was significantly less resistant in the main direction of load.

Interpretation. Scar tissue has a significantly lesser loading capacity than the intact ventral abdominal wall and therefore poses a permanent risk for herniation. For this reason, closure of the abdominal wall should be given due consideration and subjected to further investigation. Specifically, sustained reinforcement of scar tissue by means of suture techniques or non-absorbable sutures warrants further study. When constructing meshes for reinforcement of incisional hernias, the two-fold tensile load on the midline in horizontal direction as opposed to the craniocaudal direction must be taken into account.

Keywords: Linea alba, Scar tissue, Rectus sheath, Tensile strength, Incisional hernia, Tensiometry

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0268-0033(06)00126-4

doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.06.002

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 88-92, January 2007