Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 16, Issue 9 , Pages 728-734, November 2001

Do the intervertebral disc cells respond to different levels of hydrostatic pressure?

  • William C. Hutton

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
    • Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Present address: Emory Spine Center, 2165 North Decatur Road, Decatur, GA 30033, USA
  • ,
  • William A. Elmer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • ,
  • Lisa M. Bryce

      Affiliations

    • Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia, USA
  • ,
  • Ewa E. Kozlowska

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • ,
  • Scott D. Boden

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
    • Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia, USA
  • ,
  • Miroslav Kozlowski

      Affiliations

    • Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia, USA

Received 2 May 2001; accepted 21 August 2001.

Abstract 

Objective. To test the hypothesis that hydrostatic pressure directly affects the synthesis of collagen and proteoglycan by intervertebral disc cells.

Design. By the use of pressure vessels, hydrostatic pressure was applied to intervertebral disc cells cultured in alginate.

Background. The influence of compression (both hydrostatic and axial) on chondrocyte metabolism was examined in a number of earlier studies. However, in most of these studies, articular cartilage, not intervertebral disc was used, and in none of these was hydrostatic pressure applied to intervertebral disc cells cultured in alginate.

Methods. Fresh cells were harvested from the lumbar intervertebral discs of dogs. Before their suspension in an alginate gel system, the cells were plated and expanded until they reached confluence. Then, by use of the alginate gel system, the cells were exposed (for up to 9 days) to specific values of hydrostatic pressure inside two stainless steel pressure vessels. One vessel was kept at 0.35 MPa and the other at atmospheric pressure (approximately 0.1 MPa). The effects of 0.35 MPa were compared against atmospheric pressure by measuring the incorporation of -proline and -sulfate into collagen and proteoglycans, respectively, for the anulus cells and nucleus cells separately, and by determining whether this incorporation was reflected by changes in the levels of mRNA for aggrecan and Types I and II collagen.

Results. Proteoglycan synthesis was inhibited at 0.35 MPa as compared to atmospheric pressure for both the nucleus and anulus cells, whereas collagen synthesis was stimulated in the nucleus cells, but inhibited in the anulus cells. The mRNA levels of collagen 1A and collagen 2A decreased in the anulus but showed a differential response in the nucleus (collagen 1A increased, while collagen 2A decreased). The mRNA levels for aggrecan core protein decreased in the anulus and increased in the nucleus.

Conclusion. Hydrostatic pressure directly affects the synthesis of collagen and proteoglycan by the intervertebral disc cells.

Relevance

This in vitro study reveals the direct effect of hydrostatic pressure on disc cells, in the absence of other factors. However, circumspection must be applied when comparisons between these results, from in vitro experiments on dog disc cells, are extrapolated and applied to the whole discs of humans.

Keywords:  Hydrostatic pressure, Intervertebral disc, Cells, Proteoglycan, Collagen, Anulus, Nucleus

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0268-0033(01)00080-8

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 16, Issue 9 , Pages 728-734, November 2001