Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 16, Issue 8 , Pages 644-649 , October 2001

Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients

  • Markus O. Heller

      Affiliations

    • Charité, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery Research Laboratory, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • Georg Bergmann

      Affiliations

    • Oskar-Helene-Heim, Biomechanics Lab, Free University Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • Georg Deuretzbacher

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Biomechanics, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, Germany
  • ,
  • Lutz Claes

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • Norbert P. Haas

      Affiliations

    • Charité, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery Research Laboratory, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • Georg N. Duda

      Affiliations

    • Charité, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery Research Laboratory, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author

Received 28 March 2001 ,Accepted 23 May 2001.

References 

  1. Murray MP, Gore DR, Brewer BJ, Mollinger LA, Sepic SB. Joint function after total hip arthroplasty: a four-year follow-up of 72 cases with Charnley and Muller replacements. Clin. Orthop. 1981;157:119–124
  2. Herrlin K, Pettersson H, Selvik G, Lidgren L. Femoral anteversion and restricted range of motion in total hip prostheses. Acta. Radiol. 1988;29:551–553
  3. Hodge WA, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO. A relationship between stem orientation and function following total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 1991;6:229–235
  4. Cheal EJ, Spector M, Hayes WC. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Res. 1992;10:405–422
  5. Doehring TC, Rubash HE, Dore DE. Micromotion measurements with hip center and modular neck length alterations. Clin. Orthop. 1999;362:230–239
  6. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Effects of fit and bonding of femoral stems on adaptive bone remodeling. J. Biomech. Eng. 1994;116:393–400
  7. Van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R, Weinans H, Sumner DR, Turner TM, Galante JO. ESB Reseachr Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. J Biomech 1993;26:369–82
  8. Duda GN, Heller M, Albinger J, Schulz O, Schneider E, Claes L. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J. Biomech. 1998;31:841–846
  9. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J. Biomech. 1993;26:969–990
  10. Chao EYS, Rim K. Application of optimization principles in determining the applied moments in human leg joints during gait. J. Biomech. 1973;6:497–510
  11. Koch JC. The law of bone architecture. Am. J. Anat. 1917;21:177–298
  12. Evans FG, Lissner HR. Stresscoat deformation studies of the femur under static vertical loading. Anat. Rec. 1948;100:159–190
  13. Frankel V. The femoral neck. Uppsala: Almquist and Wiksells; 1960;
  14. Pauwels F. Über die mechanische Bedeutung der gröberen Kortikalisstruktur beim normalen und pathologisch verbogenen Röhrenknochen. Anat. Nachr. 1950;1:53–57
  15. Pauwels F. Atlas zur Biomechanik der gesunden und kranken Hüfte. Berlin: Springer; 1973;
  16. Rybicki EF, Simonen FA, Weis EB. On the mathematical analysis of stress in the human femur. J. Biomech. 1972;5:203–215
  17. Duda GN, Schneider E, Chao EYS. Internal forces and moments in the femur during walking. J. Biomech. 1997;30:933–941
  18. Rohlmann A, Mössner U, Bergmann G, Kölbel R. Finite-element-analysis and experimental investigation of stresses in a femur. J. Biomed. Eng. 1982;4:241–246
  19. Rohlmann A, Mössner U, Bergmann G, Kölbel R. Finite-element-analysis and experimental investigation in a femur with hip endoprosthesis. J. Biomech. 1983;16:727–742
  20. Claes L, Augat P, Suger G, Wilke H-J. Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res. 1997;15:577–584
  21. Goodship AE, Cunningham JL, Kenwright J. Strain rate and timing of stimulation in mechanical modulation of fracture healing. Clin. Orthop. 1998;355(Suppl):105–115
  22. van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R, Weinans H, Sumner DR, Turner TM, Galante JO. ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. Biomech 1993;26:369–82
  23. Halpern AA, Tanner J, Rinsky L. Does persistent fetal femoral anteversion contribute to osteoarthritis?: a preliminary report. Clin. Orthop. 1979;213–216
  24. Reikeras O, Bjerkreim I, Kolbenstvedt A. Anteversion of the acetabulum in patients with idiopathic increased anteversion of the femoral neck. Acta. Orthop. Scand. 1982;53:847–852
  25. Morlock M, Schneider E, Blum A, Vollmer M, Bergmann G, Müller V, et al. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J. Biomech. 2001;34:873–881
  26. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Is staircase walking a risk for the fixation of hip implants?. J. Biomech. 1995;28:535–553
  27. Heller MO, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Dürselen L, Pohl M, Claes L, et al. Musculo–skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J. Biomech. 2001;34:883–893
  28. Duda GN, Eckert-Huebner K, Claes L. Analysis of inter-fragmentary movement as a function of musculoskeletal loading conditions in sheep. J. Biomech. 1998;31:201–210
  29. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomech. 2001;34:859–871
  30. Andriacchi TP, Ogle JA, Galante JO. Walking speed as a basis for normal and abnormal gait measurements. J. Biomech. 1977;10:261–268
  31. Schneider E, Michel MC, Genge M, Perren SM. Loads acting on an intramedullary femoral nail. In:  Bergmann G,  Graichen F,  Rohlmann A editor. Loads acting on an intramedullary femoral nail. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin; 1990;p. 221–227
  32. Taylor SJ, Walker PS, Perry J, Cannon SR, Woledge R. The forces in the distal femur and knee during different activities measured by telemetry. Trans Ann Meet Orthop Res Soc, San Francisco 1997;1:259
  33. Finlay JB, Chess DG, Hardie WR, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. An evaluation of three loading configurations for the in vitro testing of femoral strains in total hip arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Res. 1991;9:749–759
  34. Pauwels. Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur funktionellen Anatomie des Bewegungsapparates. Berlin: Springer; 1965. p. 518
  35. Baleani M, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. Endurance testing of hip prostheses: a comparison between the load fixed in ISO 7206 standard and the physiological loads. Clin. Biomech. 1999;14:339–345
  36. Monti L, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. Methods for quantitative analysis of the primary stability in uncemented hip prostheses. Artif. Organs. 1999;23:851–859
  37. Huiskes R, van B. Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement. Clin. Orthop. 1995;319:64–76

PII: S0268-0033(01)00053-5

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 16, Issue 8 , Pages 644-649 , October 2001