Journal Home
Search for

Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages 714-716 (October 2001)


View previous. 12 of 14 View next.

Quantification of first tarsometatarsal joint stiffness in hallux valgus patients

F.W.M. FaberaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, P.E. Zollingera, G.J. Kleinrensinkb, L. Damenc, P.G.H. Mulderd, C.J. Snijderse, J.A.N. Verhaarf

Received 21 December 2000; accepted 4 May 2001.

Abstract 

Objective. Comparison of the clinical mobility test of the first tarsometatarsal joint with Doppler Imaging of Vibrations measurement of the stiffness of this joint in hallux valgus patients.

Design. Clinical testing of first tarsometatarsal joint mobility was related to independent Doppler Imaging of Vibrations measurement of first tarsometatarsal joint stiffness.

Background. Hypermobility of the first tarsometatarsal joint has consequences for the surgical treatment of hallux valgus deformity. However, the clinical test is subjective. Doppler Imaging of Vibrations could be helpful in quantification of the stiffness of this joint.

Methods. Clinical examination of the mobility of 32 first tarsometatarsal joints in 20 hallux valgus patients was compared with Doppler Imaging of Vibrations stiffness measurements performed by an independent observer.

Results. There was a statistically significant relation between the clinical test and the stiffness measurement by Doppler Imaging of Vibrations.

Conclusion. Doppler Imaging of Vibrations proves to be a method to quantify first tarsometatarsal joint stiffness and could contribute to a rational policy for the surgical treatment of hallux valgus deformity.

Relevance

The clinical test to establish hypermobility of the first tarsometatarsal joint is subjective. Doppler Imaging of Vibrations offers objective criteria and quantification of first tarsometatarsal joint stiffness. This provides additional information for the choice of the surgical procedure to correct hallux valgus deformity.

a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leyenburg Hospital, P.B. 40551, 2504 The Hague, Netherlands

b Department of Anatomy, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands

c Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands

d Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands

e Department of Biomedical Physics and Technology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands

f Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author

PII: S0268-0033(01)00044-4


View previous. 12 of 14 View next.