Transfer functions as a basis for the verification of models – variability and restraints

Abstract 

Objective. The seat-to-head transfer function of the human body reflects the biodynamic response. Based on measured data, biodynamic models have been proposed to reflect this response. They must satisfy usually the international published mean values of the seat-to-head transfer function. The question arises to what extent mean values reflect individual pattern of biodynamics.

Methods. An experimental study was performed with 39 male subjects sitting on a hard seat without back rest and with supported feet. They were exposed to random whole-body vibration at three intensities with a relaxed and an erect posture. The accelerations in the z-direction were measured at the seat and head. The seat-to-head transfer functions with the associated coherence functions were calculated.

Results. The biodynamic response characterised by the maximum of the seat-to-head transmissibility and the frequency of its occurrence is influenced by the posture of the subjects in a dominant way and shows an individual variability of considerable extent. The mean responses suggest a missing effect of vibration intensity, but individually different effects of the intensity were found. Repeated measurements confirmed this result.

Conclusions. The application of a model validated by the comparison with mean values of the transmissibility could cause misleading conclusions, if it is used for the prediction of individual spinal loads. Models prepared for the calculation of individual loads should be validated by a mean individual transmissibility derived from repeated measurements.

Relevance

The results illustrate the loss of information by averaging individual transfer functions and the consequence of a limited validity and applicability in occupational health, ergonomics, and design.

Keywords:  Spinal load, Model-verification, Seat-to-head transfer function, Whole-body vibration, Individual variability