Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 15, Issue 8 , Pages 592-599, October 2000

Gait and electromyographic analysis of patients recovering after limb-saving surgery

  • E De Visser

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Th Mulder

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • H.W.B Schreuder

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • R.P.H Veth

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author
  • ,
  • J Duysens

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical and Biophysics, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Received 14 September 1999; accepted 8 March 2000.

Abstract 

Objective. Control of gait after limb-saving surgery.

Design. Case series study.

Background. At the moment little is known about adaptations in patients' gait after limb-saving surgery.

Methods. Nineteen patients who underwent limb-saving surgery at least 1 yr earlier and 10 normal subjects were studied during treadmill walking. The main outcome measures were walking speed, step parameters and angular displacement of both legs and EMG of the biceps femoris, rectus femoris and medial gastrocnemius in the affected leg.

Results. Preferred walking speed in the patients was lower than in the controls (0.7 versus 1.1 m/s). Furthermore, stance phase of the non-affected leg was lengthened. All patients showed reduced stance phase knee flexion in the affected leg, while during the swing phase no difference was seen. The EMG signals of the rectus femoris and biceps femoris show changes, which are related to the location of surgery.

Conclusions. The results showed that the gait pattern of the patients differed compared to normal gait. The reduced stance phase knee flexion in the hip group is based on a high degree of co-contraction between quadriceps and hamstring activity, while in the knee group this is based on the quadriceps avoidance pattern. The finding that there is still side-to-side asymmetry indicates that there is no complete reorganisation following the massive loss of input and output of the leg. It is possible that some reprogramming of the locomotor process occur.

Relevance

Gait and electromyographic analysis are essential for the quantitative assessments of the functional outcome in this type of surgery.

Keywords:  Gait, Gait adaptations, EMG, Limb-saving surgery, Oncology, Hip, Knee

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0268-0033(00)00021-8

Clinical Biomechanics
Volume 15, Issue 8 , Pages 592-599, October 2000